BuzzerBeater Forums

Here, I'll take the opportunity to state for the second time how I love this idea that is BuzzerBeta ! It's great news, we are promised new features every now and then and we will test them. It sounds great.

I can't understand all the fuss with the roles. Don't use them if you don't like them. It's not required for your gameplay. Ignore it. It harms none. It does nothing. It's just there for those who think it's fun.

Oh but please continue the criticism, some of the arguments used have so much bad faith in them, it's a sunshine in my cloudy and snowy sky. Thank you BB-managers :)

Devs, you know those who like it won't come and say it, well most of them... People complain, people are conservative, especially the older members ;p People want change and when change comes, they cry foul, they feel unsecure ;p

Keep the new features coming ! We all need a big kick in the ass !

Now to balance things out, I'll come back next week and whine a bit too (on my coach certainly, I hate him, I have always hated him).

Really?! Really? Really. Really?!

Please allow the team time to test out new ideas to help improve the game. What if in the first few seasons, owners freaked out every time a new idea was tested? We wouldn't have this great game.

I say keep working on new ideas and keep making the site better.

I would rather fail at something then succeed at nothing.

Look at some of you getting your knickers in a twist over a feature that isn't even game breaking, but just an cosmetic feature.

Really.

Last edited by iwen at 12/28/2010 9:52:05 PM

Look at my roster and check Blaise Baets and Bosma

Played almoust every game, made a hughe differance in the competition and are still regular starters while my entire strategy is based upon those players. Baets and Blaise

Dont get me wrong, maybe they played not every game (due to minute management) but they are the key players of my team.
And look at the 4th division......no key players there?

In my eyes, and i played pro basketball in real life for 13 years, every team has a key player, even in the lower leagues and thats whats wrong with this. In your system you created there just looking at the players who played alot and have a high salary but they dont look at the players who are winning the games.

For example out of real life: Take John Paxon Chicago Bulls nummer 5 shooting guard, No one almoust remembers him but he shot the Bulls into 3 different Play offs before Michael Jordan finished it off in those play offs

Because off the fact you just made some big shots the key players and not the real important ones i really have to decline this improvement. Even my player from the Dutch National Team <21 is a role player???

Please explain cause i cant see the relevance in this anymore

Your missing my point

Key player is perfect word for it, but i dont see them as you see them
Every team has a key player, thats what i meant

Chicago Bulls had Michael Jorden
Suns had Charles Barkely
Celtics had LArry Bird
Lakers had MAgic Johnson

In football
Barcelona have Messi
Real Madrid have a portugese so.b.

My point point, how bad it can be, is that every team, no mather what league their in have all got one key player on who the strategy is build. And i want to see that back.....

Even if that means that your player is terrible, aslong as it is your KEY player, the one from your team where you build on, then this should be reflected in the Role

Is defense taken into account? I realize its quite a bit different, at least from a GE point of view, as on defense you dont have anyone 'running' the defense, per se.

If it is offence only, it might be quite interesting indication. But I dont see the point to look at it if I dont see average played minutes at the same time. If I have to click to get that information, they are together anyway on main page of the player, therefore I couldnt see the point in indicating offences itself.

Maybe that rating could be combination of both. Like his overall offence effectivity or something.