BuzzerBeater Forums

It's your winning personality :-) Ok, that's definitely off topic. I'm banning myself from this thread!

the thing that is clear from the news (in my opinion) is that they will implement a salary increase for players that are not from your home country.

Also, we be making good better use of player nationalities, and domestic players will be slightly (typically 10-20%) better economically than foreign ones.

i have no problem with the rule as such as long as you have a choice to use home grown players or not. i just cant see people in small countries like for example japan to have enough decent acceptable trainees to have a choice. this means it does give an unfair advantage to people that can make the choice.

I reckon that the changes will be implemented anyway to make sure a team from the smaller countries surely never will win the BBB. Imagine a country from a small team win and all the abuse that breaks loose from all the players claiming that players in small countries have an easy ride!!! (yes sarcasm here)

Are you saying that that div4 in England has different formulas that div4 in Spain? Also meaning that Div1 in England is different than Div1 in Spain? If this is so than this game would have no meaning. In different formulas case there is no way to be the top team unless you are in the biggest country.
Ofcourse you can show me a team that has 11k arena in Div4 with the same prices as you and can get the same attendance as you.

i have posted this prove before when the italians were complaining about arena sizes. look at the overal picture please. stadium revenue doesnt solely come from stadium size. the germans have the biggest stadiums by a mile. but if you look at their ticket prizes they are significantly lower than their italian counterparts. I havent done the full maths, but I doubt there is not a big difference in arena revenue if you would sit down and do the maths for all top countries and their top divisions.

and no, i am not saying that div IV in England has different formulas. I did ask you though. There are a lot off things I have no clue about and I believe most people dont know about because noone off us have the correct formulas. I could imagine that a top team in spain or italy or usa has more money to spend than a top team in japan. Yes even despite the increased salaries the real top teams have. However this is just a hunch... not based on facts. I dont have the facts and like i said doubt many have any...

ps all i do know is that the winning teams in the BBB have been teams from the top leagues or read big leagues...

Last edited by Astragoth at 2/25/2009 7:24:54 AM

i think if im not mistaken

the way i understand local players will be 10-20% better economically is that they are cheaper by 10-20% on their salary

i could be wrong but the way i understand is, if a normal australian player who has 5 sensational skill level guard on his needed skills for example will command a salary of 35-40k will be cheaper by 10-20% from their original salary if they play in australia.

so your foreign players base on the context that was given, will still have the same salary

Just unbanning myself for a second to point out that although salary is the obvious target here, the adjustment could come from tweaks to fan revenue and merchandising instead. The idea being that fans feel a closer bond with home grown players than imports.

Woah woah woah woah woah woah woah.... woah.... woah. Louis, this is not my Batman glass.

It's a little funny to explain these things to a team that has been here from season 3 but ok.
Italians were complaining that they could not build arenas because competition was fierce -> no money to expand. Other countrys took different routes.
I believe all countrys have the same formulas for div1 etc.
Now youre knowledge on arenas seems to be lacking. You can build your arena as big as you want (nobody has hit the cap). You do understand that if you build seats and lower the price on the seat it will bring you more revenue the downside is that money invested in the arena will take some time to earn back. There is actually no point of have your prices maxxed ever! Now what are the right prices? Ideal would be lowest price and full arena -> it might take a while to earn back your investment ofcourse if you expand and switch from 6$ down to 5$ and build price of seat is 200. So basically it will come back to the when is it good to lower prices at what size the arena should be and how big the seat addition should be. To get back 1 newly build seat will get your invested money back in 40 home games (that's 4 seasons). Where is the choke point in arenas noone knows yet but I'm guessing it's there somewhere. NB! Bigger arenas and lower prices also give you better managing with wins losses not effecting your revenue as much.

in all ways it will affect revenue... i think we all agree that there is only 1 way to meassure a top leagues true strength compared by other top leagues by looking at the results in BBB. For us in medium sized and lower sized countries this will mean (in my opinion) we loose competitiveness compared to the top leagues off other countries. as far as i am aware, no team from a small country has won the BBB yet. The competitiveness in just the country should stay the same since the new change would hit all managers.

However, like I tried to point out before, i have no problem with a change like this as long as there are enough decent players to build a decent squad. there are 10 decent trainees and they are really just decent 18 year old players for sale that are english. with 520 active players that is not adequate enough... just imagine how this works out with the 1 only japanees 18 year old for sale at the moment...

Last edited by Astragoth at 2/25/2009 7:52:32 AM

Now youre knowledge on arenas seems to be lacking. You can build your arena as big as you want (nobody has hit the cap).

what have i said that warrents you to say that? i made no accusation, and made no comments as if i would have the answers. there are many different ways how you can get the most from arena revenue, many people have different opinions. i am leaving mine out off this for now. what i wonder is, are these ideas based on an example you just have given me? or are they based on someone really sitting down and calculate the arena revenue for all teams in the top italian team, top german team, top spanish team etc and compare them all together to figure out what the best method is? I cant be bothered to do this, so i wont and never have commented on what is the best method. all i have done is questioned the opinion from others that have a clear view and i ask where they base their view on. is that so wrong?

I agree with you that building a big stadium is a long term strategy... or that is how i read your message. that is why my team looks quite weak at the moment. i can guarantee you my team is on the right path. A very long path but on the right one... only the long term future will tell whether big stadiums or not have a benefit... i hope i made the right choice...

Last edited by Astragoth at 2/25/2009 8:02:36 AM