First a general comment - thanks to everyone who has agreed to run. Very much appreciate the time you all take to answer questions on this forum. I enjoyed reading through the Q&A so far and I hope it becomes a little less combative and more productive going forward.
GOLDBEAR and
Thegame187 (and anyone else running for that matter):
I trained/own Rosendo Touza
(33457004), one of the players that played on a regular basis on the USA U21 team the last two seasons. When Phyr requested certain training changes (i.e. change to game shape for semis and finals; focus on some guard skills to make him a better outside PF in his early years, etc.), I gladly went along with it. A large reason I did so was because I felt like I was part of the team during the run to the finals and was more than happy to help out the team even if it didn't exactly go along with my team's training plan. This leads to a two part question: If you won't keep the conversation going on the off-site, how will encourage/motivate managers such as me to be part of the team and willing to make certain training and other short-term changes at the expense of our club teams if we don't have an on-going U21 NT conversation? In the alternative, if you will keep the conversation going on the off-site, will you change the process at all?
A second semi-unrelated question, will you change the scouting process? Phyr reached out to me on a semi-regular basis to get updates and provide training advice. Would you continue to do that and/or change that process?
PhyrA possibly simple question, but likely more complex: Where do we go from here? I do agree you overachieved getting to the finals with the team you had, and I think the conversation right now would be vastly different if we ended up not making the final four (which I won't lie, many of us though was going to be the case). Where does the fault for the lack of quality players lie and how do we try to get the USA team back to gold?
Thanks, all.
Last edited by squeakrico7 at 8/7/2015 11:01:34 AM