BuzzerBeater Forums

Or there might be a salary cap for the team lineup which would be the same for everyone. So if it would be 1M and you bought a 500k center, you have just 500k at disposal for everyone else. That sounds to me more like a multiskill issue than like a NT monster event thing.

I dislike this idea
Everyone had to have the team that he is able to afford

Why?

you can choose to spend all your money on your starting five,or distribute them on more players(8-10-12).You have to allow every team to pursue its strategy

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 12/7/2010 6:27:43 PM

I gave him one ball 'cause I agree with him :p

I actually quite like the option that a player can only represent 1 BB3 team per season.... it sure would make it fun on the transfer market and maybe force demand up for the monster salary players but as you and others have said, its a competition for 256 teams.... best to just draw a line in the sand date wise and register your players in advance for the season, maybe with a re-register period ahead of the neutral court rounds.

BUT, if as there were rumours before of other international competitions for Division 2, 3 and possibly more teams then we would be talking about a much larger pool of teams competing for temporary signatures... this would again make the dynamics of the transfer market almost impossible to predict.

When 2 teams are battling it out for 3 x $500k players a week then they will both get 1 each for 1.5mil as we've seen happening.

If we have multiple semi-finals, finals etc and 10 players on the market (8 of which have already represented a team in a previous round there is no way the remaining 2 will go for under 3-4mil)

Lets spice it up a bit!!

Oh and if you want to read some trash talk between the 2 finalists... join our Fed!!!

:D

Or there might be a salary cap for the team lineup which would be the same for everyone. So if it would be 1M and you bought a 500k center, you have just 500k at disposal for everyone else. That sounds to me more like a multiskill issue than like a NT monster event thing.

I dislike this idea
Everyone had to have the team that he is able to afford

Why?

you can choose to spend all your money on your starting five,or distribute them on more players(8-10-12).You have to allow every team to pursue its strategy

Basically I think that if there would be a salary cap, teams should spend even more to win, because great multiskills arent so cheap as monsters. But on the other side is quite possible that while you can pick best lineup, and it doesnt affect GS, because minutes arent counted in B3, well, probably best solution will not be in any kind of salary cap.

why does non B3 players have not Read Only access to that forum? :(