That's how risks work, you take take a risk and you succeed, you look like a genius. However, you take a risk and you lose... well, we all know what Discipline thinks.
Well, that was not my point at all. I believe that we were discussing your confidence level going into that game against Albany, not whether or not taking risks in general is something smart. Or stupid, if you wish.
But let's start from the beginning.
In my original post I comment that you got "a bit too overconfident." You responded how that is not true. Which is fair. The discussion should have probably end right there, but I made a beginners mistake and wrote another comment trying to explain why I thought that you were, and now we're discussing a completely new thing where you're emphasizing risk-taking opposed to my emphasis of your confidence.
If you're willing to read my previous post one more time, you'll see that my only point was that you must have felt strong about your chances, because if you didn't then you can't call it "calculated risk." Well, not the one with favorable outcome, that is. On that note, everyone can take a risk, and succeed from time to time, but only genius is genius.
Last edited by Mr. Hyde at 4/10/2011 3:36:07 PM