BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Salary increase - New salary formula

Salary increase - New salary formula

Set priority
Show messages by
From: idorux

This Post:
00
136516.107 in reply to 136516.106
Date: 3/24/2010 6:58:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Thanks Joseph and Charles for your reply. I will make a probably reasonable assumption that the accuracy of the calculator has some pretty interesting and complex reverse engineering. Although I am not quite sure how a static algorithm can predict the certainly dynamic changing entirety of the Buzzerbeater world. But I am very thankful for it :) and your entire spreadsheet Joseph.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
136516.110 in reply to 136516.108
Date: 3/24/2010 8:29:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
they will not be the best players,they will be the most expensive in terms of salary

thats what i understood

This Post:
00
136516.112 in reply to 136516.111
Date: 3/24/2010 8:54:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
we don't have Wilt Chamberlain or Michael Jordan equivalents in the game yet


Sure not, people for salary reasons will stop training them.

But maybe we can have a Lebron James with a low salary(SF's will be the cheapest position to train players), when Lebron salary on NY ;) is going to be awesome.

Last edited by Marot at 3/24/2010 8:55:34 PM

This Post:
00
136516.113 in reply to 136516.102
Date: 3/24/2010 8:56:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
thank you for this post , this clears up the majority of the issues i had with the salaries , while i still think pf/c are too expensive / too hard to train balanced compared to guards, this post clears up enough in my mind to help me sit back and watch the game evolve

From: PH-Kobe
This Post:
00
136516.114 in reply to 136516.113
Date: 3/24/2010 9:10:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
this will be the start of "guards era"..

From: sergi
This Post:
00
136516.115 in reply to 136516.87
Date: 3/24/2010 9:15:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5454
i don't get it.... very quantitatively we have increased salaries more ON A PERCENTAGE BASIS for top level players, who play on top level teams.

So for instance, a player with skills making 300K before, now makes ~330K, a 30K hike.

In contrast a player making 30K makes now ~32K a 2K hike.

So.... both in absolute terms and relative terms, we have affected upper division teams more than middle and lower division teams. It is simply untrue that we have affected lower division teams more than the upper divisions.


I'm sorry I didn't make myself clear.

Even if it is a bit off-topic I am not only complaining about the salary increase. I do understand it is on a percentage basis with top players getting a higher increase which should affect top division teams the most.

Take a look at this team from ACBB in Spain last year (please consider he just increased his arena a lot):

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/team/75328/arena.aspx

He filled an almost 12000 arena (top teams dwarf these numbers) at MAX prices all season while compiling an impresive 0-22 record. He sold all his top players at the beginning of the league so his fans loyalty was quite amazing as he was being whiped out every game.

A top II division team in Spain with a 22-0 record would not be able to fill the same arena at the same prices.

The diference in income from I to II division and from II to III is considerable.

The salary hikes will hurt lower division teams the most because they are already running on a tight budget. The rich will be rich but maybe you are making it a bit too easy for them.

I like that you regulate the economy on a year to year basis and I have seen changes on salaries, TV contracts, merchandising and never the arena.

Cheers!

Advertisement