BuzzerBeater Forums

Maples is irrelevant to the conversation.

Could you explain the difference between the NBBA and Maples, and D.III and Merrill? I don't see it.

Are they even more expensive and probably overpriced now. Hard to argue that!

How are overpriced players good for club teams?

But lets take a look at how their owners fared in each of those players 20 year old season:

Terrance Hammond: In season 16, Newmarket West Siders were crowned champions of league Canada III.11
Mike Merrill: In season 16, Hamstar Hoopers were crowned champions of league USA IV.47
Jimmie Brown: In season 16, West Lawn Mowers were crowned champions of league USA IV.61

This isn't what I'm talking about. Those are their 20 year old seasons. These guys start that 20 year old season at 13/13/13, and end it at 15/15/15, but only pay the 13/13/13 (40k-60k) salaries. That is for sure, without a doubt, a good thing for any club team. No way i'll disagree with you there.

What I've been trying to convey all along is that stopping at 14/14/14 or 15/15/15 is better for club teams than pressing on to 17/17/17. You've shown examples of how 14/14/14 and 15/15/15 bigs led their teams to promotion. 15/15/15 is fine for club teams. I'm saying that those extra pops to 17/16/17 are crucial for the U21, and devastating for club teams.

If I'm still unclear, maybe we can discuss this further.

Hey I won that game though!!

I was defending you! I've never seen so many people complain about an America's semi win...

It's probably best we take this discussion to bb-mail or the offsite. It has very little to do with actually determining who the best candidate is for the U21 coach. I'd prefer not to get wrapped up in this discussion when I have a ton of other questions to answer. It's pretty clear we each have our own thoughts on this. I'll bb-mail you with a response. If you prefer I respond here, let me know.

Maples is irrelevant to the conversation.

Could you explain the difference between the NBBA and Maples, and D.III and Merrill? I don't see it.

Maples is the most expensive player in the US and worth probably 1/2 what Merrill is?
Maples is training very slowly while Merrill was popping very quickly.

Anyways, I think the details of this matter are spiraling away from whats important in the election. You've already stated we need the best players with the best primaries and I agree wholeheartedly, as does Coco. We also need some niche and role players but they're what fills in the cracks not what forms the team.

The matter of the salaries is something we can all agree to disagree on.

GODBEAR

Then, d.III managers shouldn't train Hammond-esque bigs. It seems truly obvious...

I didn't get this memo. Thank go Hamstar didn't either.
And I know you are not serious Coco. I should point that out since you scare me and I don't want to get yelled at.

Last edited by oriolekid at 11/3/2011 7:02:32 PM

You beat me before I could edit.

I was kidding with that comment 100%.
I believe it is silly to tell a tell a manager that there are certain ways you can't train your player.

I think everyone here may be overrating driving, I've never seen a huge value in it, along with rebounding.

Looking at the U21 players, I do not think that people are overrating driving. There is one good passer, but he does not have much of any other skills.

I also disagree with rebounding being overrated. If you get out rebounded you will lose the game most of the time. If you look at any games, you will see that the winner usually outrebounds the other team and if one team is more dominant in rebouding, they will win the game by more.

Last edited by Buckeyefan01 at 11/3/2011 7:27:36 PM

If you get out rebounded you will lose the game most of the time. If you look at any games, you will see that the winner usually outrebounds the other team and if one team is more dominant in rebouding, they will win the game by more.

You know, this is very interesting. I decided to test out this method on some other things. Did you know that the team that makes more shots than the other team also seems to win most of the time? Amazing, the team with more assists ALSO! seems to win most of the time. And this one's hard to believe, but the team that plays better defense and prevents the other team from making more shots, you guessed it, seems to win most of the time!

Point being, more of any skill is ALWAYS better. The question has to be, which is *more* important? In this case, are you suggesting that guards should get more rebounding training at the expense of js, od, pa, etc? I'm not saying I agree or disagree, but I think that's a very unusual recommendation when discussing u21 players who need to maximize their training time, so I'd like to hear you defend this.