BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Prevent GMs to decide on issues...

Prevent GMs to decide on issues...

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
277748.111 in reply to 277748.109
Date: 4/17/2016 7:13:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
Imagine the rules set a line a 100. We usually accept people to go to 120. Then, some users go to 130 repeatedly, they got sanctionned. Their accepted line progressively goes closer to 100 due to that.

As Manon says, if we were to act on anything over 100, many here would be unhappy with their freedom taken which would be totally in the BBs right on their private website. Problem with accepting to go to 120 for some leeway and everyone enjoying the forums, it's that some do want to see if they can go to 121, 122, 123 then are surprised when Mods finally act.

I propose that, sometimes in the future, we do a "Line is at 100 month" to see if it suits people.


Well, setting the line at 100, would probably lead to a few banned staff members, if applied correctly.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
From: Knecht

This Post:
00
277748.112 in reply to 277748.110
Date: 4/17/2016 7:15:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
I did cross the line in response to the insult, but if moderated accordingly both of us should have been fined.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
277748.113 in reply to 277748.107
Date: 4/17/2016 7:19:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
Do I have to be a nice guy? I am just being myself and I know I can't be loved by everybody- you had your fair share of bans too, so don't even try to pretend you are better than me.

In a few cases my oh so negative input brought valuable changes, maybe that's why I am still around...

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
From: Chekreyes

This Post:
55
277748.116 in reply to 277748.115
Date: 4/17/2016 11:50:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
926926
I for one am impressed with your patience. If I were a GM I most likely would have done something like delete every single one of Mike Franks posts in this forum so far as he is borderline trolling now.

Hats off for your tolerance.

This Post:
00
277748.117 in reply to 277748.109
Date: 4/17/2016 11:54:27 AM
Durham Wasps
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
Imagine the rules set a line a 100. We usually accept people to go to 120. Then, some users go to 130 repeatedly, they got sanctionned. Their accepted line progressively goes closer to 100 due to that.

Imagine the rules set a line of 100. You usually accept people go to 120. Sometimes though misunderstandings occur, sometimes due to language, and sometimes to someone not reading something properly, or even mistaking one user for another, and a post that only goes to 90 on your scale gets deleted incorrectly. Then the person who went to 90 would feel aggrieved.

Let alone what happened to me when someone complained about me paying him a compliment so it was deleted. That on your scale would have scored 0.

I propose that, sometimes in the future, we do a "Line is at 100 month" to see if it suits people.

I predict a lot of people will have posts deleted that I would score in the 80s and 90s.

Advertisement