there must still be a bug in the 3-2 ratings as thats far off what we know his guards are capable of achieving
let's just say one of my defenders could school conte on the defensive end.
there must still be a bug in the 3-2 ratings as thats far off what we know his guards are capable of achievingOne of the BB's looked into that and said everything looked good awhile back.
Either way both games were top games and at least worthy of a mention in the news but as stated other things are priority....
I'm not trying to knock either your or Drunkers win. Based on this and last year, clearly the two best teams in BB.i am sure that among me, burns and the good doctor, hambourg would be the team we would be least excited to play - so no offense taken. let's just say one of my defenders could school conte on the defensive end.But that guy isn't Daryl Johnson, and based on the individual ratings Hambourgs PG/SF shot well under what you'd expect they would.johnson isn't a slouch on outside d these days (although i doubt could match hambourg's sf), but the idea of a 3-2 is that the great guard defenders help out the sf, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the opponent's outside shooting.
I'm not trying to knock either your or Drunkers win. Based on this and last year, clearly the two best teams in BB.
let's just say one of my defenders could school conte on the defensive end.But that guy isn't Daryl Johnson, and based on the individual ratings Hambourgs PG/SF shot well under what you'd expect they would.
I pulled a decent 3-2 rating today which was inline with what I was hoping for... so contrary to my original post this is the first time I am coming round to the idea they are ok.. but my players are probably still short of JBMs when it comes to OD so I am bemused at his team ratings earlier today.
Anyway we can move the game time so that burns doesn't have to stay up until 3 am to watch the game live? It's not like this is a home game for me.