BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Motion vs. 3-2

Motion vs. 3-2

Set priority
Show messages by
From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
197095.11 in reply to 197095.4
Date: 9/25/2011 8:11:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
What do You want to prove by showing match with PG with 3k salary? ;-)
Only reasonable conclusion from this match is that PG with 3k salary decreases chance to win match ;-)
All other conclusions have no sense because importance of weak PG and SG is much greater than impact of tactics.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
197095.13 in reply to 197095.12
Date: 9/25/2011 6:53:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
This game is a really bad example for any point...

This Post:
00
197095.15 in reply to 197095.10
Date: 9/27/2011 8:52:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3636
As B.B.King said, the game was lost more because Fumoffu played weak players at PG and SG. Imagine, a 3k PG being defended by a 17k PG. the match-up was a mismatch. But the game was close. Maybe Kanazawa Kings have bad perimeter defenders, that even with a 3-2 and more effort, only produced a strong team rating for perimeter defense and a very close game.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
197095.17 in reply to 197095.16
Date: 9/27/2011 9:16:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but you still had the better roster, if you are happy i claim that you are better then both teams played in the first match ;)

probadly i could show you today that FCp is a awesome defense^^

Last edited by CrazyEye at 9/27/2011 9:16:29 AM

This Post:
00
197095.18 in reply to 197095.16
Date: 9/27/2011 2:39:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
Here is an example of a game i played against DBR. A LI versus Motion that went into over time. Both teams using neutral defense and same effort.

(36558219)

But I felt i won the game by virtue of the HCA.

Well, if i may say, LI do not seem to have that much of an advantage over motion. It would still depend on the player match-ups in the game.

Last edited by frozensoul at 9/27/2011 2:41:50 PM

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
22
197095.19 in reply to 197095.16
Date: 9/27/2011 3:26:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
(36208942)

FCP > man to man

i layed man to man to win the game, he didn't so he lost.

From: ClipCap

This Post:
00
197095.21 in reply to 197095.1
Date: 9/27/2011 10:17:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
He lost that game because he has no Offensive Flow & got called for way too many Fouls. He could play that again & not get called for anywhere near that many Fouls & win.
I like to run Motion, won 2 Cups playing that way, but there is no doubt that LI is the best Offense. The Ball inside isn't anywhere near as hard as it should be, to get to your bigs, & LI is based mainly on 3 players Motion or RnG 4 players. So LI is also a more cost affective way to build your team. Add to that the Cost of buying some of those HUGE bigs out there, hard to see how LI ever loses, if done right ;)
Me, I just like to do things differently, that's why I play Motion quite a bit.

Last edited by ClipCap at 9/27/2011 10:18:45 PM

Right is not a popularity contest!
Advertisement