Enne mängu Saksamaaga -
The German coach, I felt that we play both with a minimum commitment. Because we need to have a high enough enthusiasm to France, where in front of us can match with Azerbaijan. In addition, we have secured victory against Germany, even if they play with normal vigor. Given the players and the schedule of counting that we will be France or Estonia more dangerous in the competition for advancement than Germany, so we must be better prepared for those matches.
Peale esimest nende mängu Saksamaaga -
We do not šuterjev, but we have good centers and excellent quarterback and "prodiralce". The choice was very easy.
I knew that we played against Germany under the basket. Centre we have a little better than their external line has a very good passes and penetration. Šuterjev we do not, so that an external and neutral tactics fall. What is left is the difference between slow and faster version of the attack under the basket. I quickly picked it because I knew only a little better in attack and in defense a little worse and expect the Germans chose a slow tactics, which is exactly what happened (I did not expect the Movement, but Low post - give the post office). A team with a stronger attack is required to play faster tactic, since you draw so many opportunities to recycle bin. In addition, we played with the left hand, which slightly weakens the attack and jump and was a logical choice.
The biggest problem was the choice of three outfield players. Požlep a little worse because of the opportunity to form their look from the bench and take it very well. The first lineup: CE is the best pass, B and C but are also very good external defense and provides a great jump in, and this is decided. I did not want to risk the brewery, it is not in the best shape, but still under-the outer defenses. I'll try to fix and we can come in handy later.