BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > CT/TIE

CT/TIE

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
23340.11 in reply to 23340.10
Date: 4/8/2008 10:19:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
Yes, I have got you point. In my case, I know very well my league group, so I don´t expect anything similar to this (they are soooo predictable..).
Look at the two examples of my post to BB-Forrest, particularly the second.
I hope you have got also my point... if you can play several consecutive CT without a clear drawback, it does not look very logic, and it could be fixed.

Even I don´t want to know the answer, just to point out something I have seen, which could be improved.
Thanks for your comments.

Last edited by Emilio at 4/8/2008 11:33:54 AM

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
This Post:
00
23340.12 in reply to 23340.11
Date: 4/9/2008 12:52:16 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
i'll take a look at the two examples, and the code. but when you CT, do you not see your enthusiasm go down? if you aren't seeing CT affecting your own enthusiasm i'd be concerned, but I think that is working as designed.. and so i'm tending to think that it is simply an issue of you don't actually knowing what is going on with the CT/TIE decisions in games that are not your own.... but again.. i'll take a closer look when i have more time.

From: LA-Niko

This Post:
00
23340.13 in reply to 23340.11
Date: 4/11/2008 10:06:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
I think the point is that you can only really know for sure what the other team played if you are one of the teams playing because you know what you went.

It is very unlikely consecutive CTs would be successful I CTed my cup tournament and then lost a few games afterward but playing TIE.

Keeping good team form and high enthusiasm is a very good strategy for winning. But neither are going to be reflected in the ratings.

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
From: Emilio

This Post:
00
23340.14 in reply to 23340.13
Date: 4/11/2008 12:46:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
Probably you are right. This is the more logical answer to my post.
It is so logical that I also have thought about it before posting.

But the point is:

By playing CT you loose enthusiasme.
Playing CT makes you more "lucky" but next match you loose defense and rebound.
If you play CT again, you will be again more "lucky" (more or less than before???), and maybe this "more luck" can compensate the lower defense and rebound.

I just wonder whether this is true or not, and I expect an answer like this: "You are wrong, I played two consecutives CT and it was a disaster!".

I hope someone understand my doubt...

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
From: LA-Niko

This Post:
00
23340.15 in reply to 23340.14
Date: 4/11/2008 1:05:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
There is no "luck buildup" as far as I know or have ever experienced.

Playing CT temporarily boosts a teams effectiveness. The following game the team will lose effectiveness. The level of boost to their effectiveness and the drop is based on the level of enthusiasm.

There is no cumulative effect of CTs. That would be silly. I am sure the games are correct. If anyone experiences anything in their own team that seems to backup this "luck" theory then come back with it.

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
From: Emilio

This Post:
00
23340.16 in reply to 23340.15
Date: 4/11/2008 1:16:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
I am talking about luck, but I mean this random factor mentioned in the news about the ME changes. As you say, it would be silly if my theory is true. Silly if it was planned like that, and bug if not.
I guess not many people played consecutive CTs because this does not seem very clever.

Thanks for your answer!

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
From: LA-Niko

This Post:
00
23340.17 in reply to 23340.16
Date: 4/11/2008 2:21:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
The random factor from what I know of the BB's thinking is the random factor of individual player performance in a particular day.

I know they did change how enthusiasm effects the GE and I will bring it to their attention if someone can report that they are getting successful wins from several CTs in a row.

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
This Post:
00
23340.19 in reply to 23340.18
Date: 4/11/2008 3:54:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
After 1 CT your ability to win the next game playing CT should be greatly diminished.

After 2 or 3 CT matches it should be basically impossible unless the other team has the same enthusiasm as you (1)

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
This Post:
00
23340.20 in reply to 23340.19
Date: 4/11/2008 6:42:13 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
well.. after 2/3 CT your enthusiasm is low, and that's why you should have a hard time winning. The "effect" of CTing isn't any different though.

Message deleted