Oh I see. That makes more sense. I suppose if nothing changed game shape wise or tactical wise, then it makes sense since the games were back to back in the same week.
Well still things like that shouldn't happen , every game should be a live update and that's what I'm talking about, if u want to improve the overall of the game it can be done. How long bb had been running ? 4-5 years now maybe even 6, there can be a virtual model of the game engine and it will improve the quality and consumer rate by Plenty u guys gotta believe
because its the only factor out the GE ... it is a developing basic question, same input data always gives same output data, any other behaivour will be chaotic and uncontrollableits not a bug, there is no random in programming (of course, always talking about a good programmer)
because its the only factor out the GE ... it is a developing basic question, same input data always gives same output data, any other behaivour will be chaotic and uncontrollableits not a bug, there is no random in programming (of course, always talking about a good programmer)What do you mean "no random in programming" ? You can generate pseudo-random numbers with any programming language.of course, but a programmer (a good one) never put them into a code ... i mean, if you want random effect you can make it, but always will be the same random result, (it will be random to the user eyes but not to the debugger) cause anyother way it will be impossible to solve bugsyou ll never have to use a "goto" or a "random" sentece in programming, you learn that in the first lesson
because its the only factor out the GE ... it is a developing basic question, same input data always gives same output data, any other behaivour will be chaotic and uncontrollableits not a bug, there is no random in programming (of course, always talking about a good programmer)What do you mean "no random in programming" ? You can generate pseudo-random numbers with any programming language.