BuzzerBeater Forums

Yea, but still Korea got 5 users, Bosnia 130, it should be normal to get at least few good players and good potentials...
Last few seasons are really frustrating, almost 1/3 of our community work with U21/NT to get some results, and the pool of our players after drafts is awful...

Yea, but still Korea got 5 users, Bosnia 130, it should be normal to get at least few good players and good potentials...

And then, it's normal that Bosnia has not as good of a draft than bigger countries.

I count 5 HOF in Bosnia U21 team. That's more than the France and Italia teams combined.

Current roster might not be fully representative of either country, but still.

That's because the bigger nations have the privilege to train MVP and even more HOFs from 18 for the NT.
And they make the U21 mostly from 7-8/9 pot players.
We can't do that.

PS those 5 players are from 2 different generations.

We don't want equal draft as big nations, just a normal one with few OK players.
In my opinion, for 130 teams, 2 HOF players is awful.
And even you get those 2, they can have like 40 TSP or something like that and you can't do nothing with them..

Hope you got the point mate.

Please, don't mix an apples and oranges !

I started this topic to get different kind of opinions and to discuss about draft, especially is it possible to change something. To be more exact, is it possible to create something like fixed percentage of the upcoming potentials.

As I already said, 1% of ATG, 3% of HOF players etc.

Personally, I don't have problem with Spain, France, Poland, Italy, USA or any other bigger community on BB getting ( for example ) 20 HOF and 5 ATG players per season... I have a problem with us getting no more than 2-3 HOF and 0 ATG players every season.

Let's look at that this way... don't you think that, if we give more talents to smaller countries like Montenegro, Belarus, Iran, New Zealand ( around 20-30 users ) other managers from other, big countries wouldn't pay for those youngsters and train them to sell them later and to earn some money ? And those small countries will get more quality players in their rosters ( senior and junior ).

Finally:

If one community has 100 users ( 300 draft players ) and we create those fixed percentages to them, I don't see problem if Bosnia gets 9 HOF and 3 ATG and France ( 2100 players ) getting around 60 HOF and 21 ATG players.

As a community we'll manage to reach every single HOF player. And I don't care about big communities. Give just a minimum to us. Number of players that we can work with !

Look at TL now. You can find 85 HOF and 1 ATG French player at transfer list ! How many of them are kept in teams and not on sale ?!

On the other hand, we've got ( Bosnia ) 2 18yo HOF players and 2 19yo HOF players ( 45-50 TSP). What we can do with that ? That's what I'm talking about. One season is ok, two seasons in a row are awful, and imagine if you get 10 HOF and 1 ATG player in 4 seasons and other communities by that time have minimum of 200-250 HOF and 20 ATG players.

I respect big communities and I do think that bigger communities should get bigger numbers of quality players, but if we can't be equal, it should be done proportionaly !

Greece, 687 active users.
Nymber of 18y, HoF, minimum skills 45, draftees on ΤL: 1


Last edited by maddoghellas at 6/4/2020 10:46:58 AM

Greece, 687 active users.
Nymber of 19y, HoF, minimum skills 55, draftees on ΤL: 2

Who cares about TL? How many HOF-s you got from draft with 18y?

We got 2 from 130 teams.

Ι care. You should too.

Besides that, the numbers of Bosnian(10+) draftees are tragic and compromise the very good job you've been doing with both your NTs.
HoF and ATG draft pool should be the same for every country, as a percentage to the entire draft pool.
Randomness could exist in the (common for all countries)percentage.

Last edited by maddoghellas at 6/4/2020 11:11:31 AM