BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Unbalanced leagues lead to unfair promotion

Unbalanced leagues lead to unfair promotion

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
319749.11 in reply to 319749.10
Date: 7/15/2024 5:03:42 PM
Complexo RJ
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
A small change that I think would help a lot in this matter:

Split the last split in half with active users in the country.

(Ex from my country: Division III)

Those relegated from division II would be replaced only by teams from III.1 to III.8 (half of the division).
The relegated/bots from leagues III.1 to III.8 would be replaced by teams from III.9 to III.16 (the second half of the division).

Both following the same current criteria. No change.


In practice, it would be similar to creating a league for new users, who do not pay a minimum salary, to get acquainted with the game while playing matches only against peers and bots.

Consequently, it would improve the level of the last division with active users and,
mainly
would solve the problem raised here in this thread! =)


This Post:
00
319749.12 in reply to 319749.2
Date: 7/10/2025 3:08:39 AM
QQguest
I.1
Overall Posts Rated:
334334
I see a new team (209242) that was created on 2025/7/7 and got promoted just by previous team’s record (1st in the conference). /league/7832/overview.aspx?season=68
This is clearly unreasonable.
I suggest that, for example after the playoffs, new teams should not replace computer teams that made it to the playoffs.
This can help reduce cases where teams that shouldn’t be promoted end up getting promoted.


Last edited by little Guest at 7/10/2025 3:15:56 AM

This Post:
00
319749.13 in reply to 319749.2
Date: 7/25/2025 11:50:11 AM
QQguest
I.1
Overall Posts Rated:
334334
This proposal to change the league structure (327465.1) is similar to Plan C in the fresh team league section.