BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > NFL Talk

NFL Talk

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
220571.111 in reply to 220571.109
Date: 1/10/2013 4:43:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
You refer to the Packers alot as 'we' and 'us'. What position do you play?

This Post:
11
220571.112 in reply to 220571.111
Date: 1/10/2013 5:10:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
Section 686 popcorn vendor.

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
22
220571.113 in reply to 220571.112
Date: 1/10/2013 5:23:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
367367
It annoys me very much when people say this. Its not as if he's taking credit for what the Packers are doing. And is it so far-fetched that fans would consider themselves somewhat connected to the team, since the team exists to serve them? Particularly with a team as community-oriented as the Packers.

This Post:
11
220571.114 in reply to 220571.113
Date: 1/10/2013 8:23:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
It annoys me very much when people say this. Its not as if he's taking credit for what the Packers are doing. And is it so far-fetched that fans would consider themselves somewhat connected to the team, since the team exists to serve them? Particularly with a team as community-oriented as the Packers.



then we are both equally annoyed. It annoys me very much when something we are fans of we somehow think we are now actually a member of. Following the Rolling Stones on tour does not make one a member of the band. I consider myself completely connected to the teams I love, but would never be so presumptouos and self involved to consider myself an actual team member. Just because a Bud Light commercial implies you can alter the course of a game by how you hold your beer bottle doesnt make it true. I respect your right to be annoyed, as I also continue to be.

This Post:
00
220571.115 in reply to 220571.114
Date: 1/10/2013 9:06:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
367367
I dont think it has anything to do with being presumptuous or self-involved

Considering that, with many teams, fans pay for the stadiums that the teams play in, and also the fact that those that attend games in fact do sometimes directly affect what happens on the field, and the fact that fans support these franchises and indirectly pay these people's salaries with merchandise and gate reciepts and TV deals, I dont think its all that ridiculous, when you own a jersey and go to games and watch your team on TV, to consider yourself a part of that team.

Particularly in the case of the Packers, where the fans literally pay the player's salaries.


This Post:
00
220571.116 in reply to 220571.115
Date: 1/10/2013 11:26:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
I accept your view as valid, I just disagree. If you ever work hard and accomplish something difficult, then have someone not involved take credit you will fully understand how I view this subject. As a rabid Dodger fan who goes to at least 20 home games a year (minimum) owns jerseys and lots of memorabilia, I just never ever elevate myself to team member and refer to the Dodgers as 'mine' or 'we', its disrespectful of the actual effort they put forth and the work they do imo. If anything they own me, not the other way around.

This Post:
22
220571.117 in reply to 220571.116
Date: 1/10/2013 11:53:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
I am the official water boy for the Denver Broncos (I get many appearances on television as well). I believe that this counts as being part of the team, for I contribute to their success. We would not be nearly as successful if i wasn't on the sidelines, working my ass of, making sure everyone is hydrated.

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
This Post:
00
220571.118 in reply to 220571.108
Date: 1/11/2013 1:34:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
143143
I completely agree with you this guy is their franchise, what if he had done permanent damage to his knee and could never play again. Wow for a wildcard playoff game that they were not going to win anyway. If they would have started Cousins they would have still been in the game they still would have lost but they would have a healthy RGIII for the start of next season. And Seattle could go into Atlanta and win that game, don't be surprised if they do they are very solid on both sides of the ball.

Garry Muir
From: tough
This Post:
00
220571.119 in reply to 220571.1
Date: 1/13/2013 4:20:37 PM
Mountain Eagles
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
763763
Second Team:
Ric Flair Drippers
omg Seattle came back all for nothing

3 Time NBBA Champion. Certified Trainer. Mentor. Have any questions? Feel free to shoot me a BB-Mail!
From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
00
220571.120 in reply to 220571.119
Date: 1/13/2013 4:27:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
omg Seattle came back all for nothing


I think the worst thing that could have happened to them was the touchdown being upheld. If they had ruled it a fuimble the ball would have been spotted at the 1 inch line and the clock should have started, and they might have been able to run it down so Atlanta wouldn't have time to score. On the other hand, they could have played defense. Of course, then again, Atlanta could have kicked the ball off further than eleven yards. All things considered it was a sublime mix of good play and really screwy plays.

This Post:
00
220571.121 in reply to 220571.110
Date: 1/13/2013 6:37:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
My regular predictions were, Falcons vs. Ravens in the beggining

Advertisement