BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Plight of smaller nations...

Plight of smaller nations...

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
206866.113 in reply to 206866.112
Date: 2/6/2012 1:21:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
making decisions based on 100 people's comments is not such an easy decision. Just because some people are vocal does not mean they should be given priority.


Well you could start a poll to find out how the games population feels about certain things. Try to be creative...

This Post:
00
206866.114 in reply to 206866.113
Date: 2/6/2012 3:48:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
making decisions based on 100 people's comments is not such an easy decision. Just because some people are vocal does not mean they should be given priority.


Well you could start a poll to find out how the games population feels about certain things. Try to be creative...
And that poll will be answered by the same ~50 users (and I am on the very optimistic side...).

This Post:
00
206866.116 in reply to 206866.115
Date: 2/6/2012 4:10:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
making decisions based on 100 people's comments is not such an easy decision. Just because some people are vocal does not mean they should be given priority.


Well you could start a poll to find out how the games population feels about certain things. Try to be creative...
And that poll will be answered by the same ~50 users (and I am on the very optimistic side...).


then better do nothing ... as we never will have a major opinion

1) Having that kind of poll is close to nothing - 50 out of 50K , and biased 50 are close to 0...

2) When answering polls will be part of the game - when one will not answer a poll (that will be informed to all), he will be fined (for example) - it may work.
Just using polls as it is will not do any good.

This Post:
00
206866.117 in reply to 206866.113
Date: 2/6/2012 4:22:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
I think you and I both know that the response to a poll would still be under representative of the BB population. Perhaps a mailing asking us to reply to several questions could get a decent response, but then someone must come up with what few questions are most important and worthwhile for the community as a whole.

Let me ask you this. What are the main topics of discussion in the German forum? Do they basically mimic what goes on here in global? There are less than 10 regular German/Austrian posters here but I am sure there must be many more on your dedicated language forum. What are the pressing concerns there?

Perhaps there could be a 20th anniversary state-of-the-game questionnaire that could be sent out to all users. Information from said questionnaire could be used to help assess the direction of the game.

While I don't think a poll is the answer, I think you are on the right track and that some sort of site-wide questionnaire would be valuable.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
206866.119 in reply to 206866.117
Date: 2/6/2012 4:42:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Let me ask you this. What are the main topics of discussion in the German forum? Do they basically mimic what goes on here in global? There are less than 10 regular German/Austrian posters here but I am sure there must be many more on your dedicated language forum. What are the pressing concerns there?

Perhaps there could be a 20th anniversary state-of-the-game questionnaire that could be sent out to all users. Information from said questionnaire could be used to help assess the direction of the game.

While I don't think a poll is the answer, I think you are on the right track and that some sort of site-wide questionnaire would be valuable.


the main topics are suggestions and training/box score delays, so I guess its pretty much the same as global. Recently the germans became a little thin-skinned, dunno why tbh.

Creating a poll is no big deal, but it is useless if you cant put in hours and hours of work to analyse the results, draw the right conclusions and take the necessary measures. I am not so sure if there are the capacities to do this.

From: malice

This Post:
00
206866.121 in reply to 206866.120
Date: 2/7/2012 5:49:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
I don't think that it's that they don't care per se... I would suggest that it's simple apathy.
"Caring/not caring" would intimate that some consideration has occurred - and I don't think that's what's going on.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
22
206866.122 in reply to 206866.121
Date: 2/12/2012 2:07:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
A poll isn't needed.

It doesn't matter if 100 people think it is a problem or if one person thinks so.

The BBs are smart guys, they made this fantastic game, they can look at the situation and use their brilliant game developer minds.

Is there a problem or at the VERY least a percieved problem?

Can't be denied.

Is there an unbelievably simple solution that would take minimal coding and a trivial effort that has already been suggested?

Yes. Change one line of code somewhere that says that new teams start in 2.1 and edit it to 3.1.

I can't remember who suggested this change but it totally changes things. Players will start in 3.1 with other players but in an easy competition. When they promote they will end up in a random division 2 not all bunched up. Teams stuck in 2.1 can even aim for relegation, then when promoted again in the bot cleanup will have a 3/4 chance of not being in 2.1. It gives the new 3.1 teams a chance at some sense of short term achievement in winning a championship and then a better chance to also win a division 2 championship.

From: malice
This Post:
11
206866.123 in reply to 206866.122
Date: 2/29/2012 7:22:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Yet the stupidity continues. New players get piled into leagues that virtually ensure that they won't last more than a month.
Poignant that not a single BB has commented here...

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
Advertisement