I want to add one last thing. I was tied with Darkonza (4th) on the B3 prediction competition, so unlike most people giving their piece of mind here, i did have a chance to win a free supporter. I bet on Darkonza, fully knowing he was the underdog and assuming everyone else would bet on Cements, and therefore if there is someone who should be allowed to complain about the walkout that would be me. In fact, it's just me and very few others (whoever of the top 3 in the rankings who lost out) plus cements' manager who will get less credit for a deserved trophy which was extremely likely for him anyway. The rest of the people complaining in this thread really wouldn't have gained anything from Darkonza playing the game.
Unlike most people here, I was directly affected and I do have multiple reasons to participate (one obviously being that we find out we can all be subjected to random 'institutional' walkouts, with training screw up). As I said, I have absolutely no problem with Darkonza's decision, I'm happy for him that he got to convey his message in a powerful way, he immediately congratulated the winning manager, other than that I really don't care.
Disclaimer: now I will use a common argument used again and again by the naysayers who like shoot down anyone trying to talk honestly about the game.
The people who 'complain' about Darkonza's decision should stop 'whining'. After all, walk outs, games thrown etc. are 'part of the game' and when betting you 'should consider the possibility' of that happening. So if you bet on the wrong team, it's your problem, it was always possible for this to happen both by accident or on purpose. You should have considered that beforehand.
I love how stupid this sounds, but that's what some of us have to suffer continuously on forums and I relish the opportunity to stress how ridiculous this is.
Last edited by Lemonshine at 2/11/2016 5:35:20 PM