BuzzerBeater Forums

there is something wrong in my bbs , suddenly...
it was working before, but when i load the new cbbroster today... this comes out


just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.

************** Exception Text **************
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at _B.Form1.getCellValue(String positionCode, DataRow r)
at _B.Form1.calcNewVals()
at _B.Form1.loadDataFromFile(String fileName)
at _B.Form1.loadXMLToolStripMenuItem_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at _B.Form1.tsButtonLoadXML_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.RaiseEvent(Object key, EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripButton.OnClick(EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleClick(EventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleMouseUp(MouseEventArgs e)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEventInteractive(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEvent(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)


************** Loaded Assemblies **************
mscorlib
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300)
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll
----------------------------------------
BBS
Assembly Version: 0.2.0.0
Win32 Version: 0.2.0.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Ball%20Break/My%20Documents/bbs/BBS.exe
----------------------------------------
System.Windows.Forms
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300)
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
----------------------------------------
System
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300)
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Drawing
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300)
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Data
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300)
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_32/System.Data/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Data.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Xml
Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0
Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.832 (QFE.050727-8300)
CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
----------------------------------------
Calculator
Assembly Version: 1.0.2880.25242
Win32 Version: 1.0.0.0
CodeBase: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Ball%20Break/My%20Documents/bbs/Calculator.DLL
----------------------------------------

************** JIT Debugging **************
To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
application or computer (machine.config) must have the
jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
The application must also be compiled with debugging
enabled.

For example:

<configuration>
<system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />
</con

I just began with BB yesterday and got my new team. Thank y'all very much for all the work on the formulas. I don't know which one of the posted is the best so far but i tried to implement a practice factor.
Since in my team all players got a respectable practice shape i assumed this was the default setting. The curiousity about that is that the XML file gives a 6 for that and not a 7, like i expected it to be.

Anyways, so i worked with 6 as the default setting and added this to some formula i took from this tread (i believe it was micio's, so thank you for that... i hope it's working well ;) ).

this is it, i'm not sure if i'm right about this:

[formula] + (([pr]-6)*0.07*[formula])

What do you think of that?

Edited by DonFelipe (08.02.2008 15:20:12 CET)

Last edited by DonFelipe at 2/8/2008 3:20:13 PM

I`ll just leave my formulas like them are now... (:

but I think your idea has a point...

Would be nice if you could add height and binary home / away buttons to the formula tool in the next version... Team rating predictions (can be with own formulas of course) and enthusiasm level settings would be sweet also.

Edited by DonFelipe (08.02.2008 17:28:48 CET)

Last edited by DonFelipe at 2/8/2008 5:28:49 PM

I allso missed Height...

height is only for train or?

if you play with center with height 200 there`s more chance that he will get block allso his training is slower, but thats not the point... Logical that more height is Center more chances to defend the basket...

Maybe I`m wrong I don`t really know, but I think that I should be right.

You're wrong. Height affects training speed ONLY. This has been discussed in detail in several different threads.

sorry I just missed that... and that means I am wrong...

I could add that sometimes like now I really miss coz if C 180cm could play against C 224cm... just don`t have what to say... Lithuania is county made of Basketball... It`s our religion... so this is really funny...

Edited by LA-ZyZla (2008.02.08 18:32:22 CET)

Last edited by ZyZla at 2/8/2008 6:32:22 PM

Well, when you consider the reasoning behind this, it makes perfect sense. A player's skill in a given position takes his height into account. Example: a 6'2" strong rebounder is more skilled at rebounding than a 7'2" strong rebounder. However, the 7'2" rebounder is much taller and that makes up for his lack of skill. Therefore, they are equally good rebounders.