BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make the best players actually desirable

Make the best players actually desirable

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
158188.115 in reply to 158188.113
Date: 10/15/2010 7:26:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Training 6-7 skills makes a huge difference. They are not pushing for insane heights and are training players for actual use.
If you overtrain, obviously you lose value.

From: Rycka
This Post:
22
158188.116 in reply to 158188.114
Date: 10/15/2010 7:27:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
this thread is rubbish. LA-Kukoc pointed out something, that needs closer attention. this is it:

How can you question the game creators Lebron?


how can you ? :)

This Post:
11
158188.117 in reply to 158188.114
Date: 10/15/2010 7:37:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
TRAIN SMARTER DOESN'T MEAN STOP TRAINING THEIR PLAYERS!
No it means, also train secondarys, or when the salary is starting to get out of hand, switch training spot/trainee or train stamina/FT/GS.
The fact that I find quite strange is that a team can't afford ONE of these players
As I already said, divI teams can afford them. Smart managers just are not willing to trade off strenght in every other spot to use them. Can you blame them?
You obviously can't stop NT player trainers, but one thing they should understand is: they should not be training those players thinking about later profit to their team, it's a one way street and all downhill at a certain point. Also any manager who wants to compete in a salary cap manager game, should stop fantasizing about those pushed to maximum NT "freaks".

This Post:
00
158188.118 in reply to 158188.117
Date: 10/16/2010 7:27:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
TRAIN SMARTER DOESN'T MEAN STOP TRAINING THEIR PLAYERS!
No it means, also train secondarys, or when the salary is starting to get out of hand, switch training spot/trainee or train stamina/FT/GS.
Yes,but a top level center however requires a certain level in the primary skills that bring a level of salary that can't be under a certain point

The fact that I find quite strange is that a team can't afford ONE of these players
As I already said, divI teams can afford them. Smart managers just are not willing to trade off strenght in every other spot to use them.

It's exactly the point,and you just confirm that the system don't work for these players
I would understand if div I team would want 2 or 3 of these players chosing to sacrifice talent in other spots or in the bench,but that a top team are forced to not afford one of them,leaving them in the farms,it's against the logic that the strongest players should play in the strongest teams


This Post:
00
158188.119 in reply to 158188.116
Date: 10/16/2010 7:31:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
this thread is rubbish. LA-Kukoc pointed out something, that needs closer attention. this is it:

How can you question the game creators Lebron?


how can you ? :)

Your post is rubbish.If you not have argument to explain your thoughts,just not talk

The point of this thread is not Lebron,that was just used as example.La-Kukoc explains his phrase with argumtns,I don't agree with him,but he use some reasoning

Your post just not have it.This is not a personal attack againt you as manager or as user,this is an attack againt thiis post in this thread

From: Rycka

This Post:
11
158188.121 in reply to 158188.120
Date: 10/16/2010 9:53:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
We need to seperate two things here, which are the best players (1) and the highest wages (2).

The best players will not earn the most. You need to see the salary as a scale where players are being put in. A 500k player now, will probably not be a 500k player a few seasons from now (he will most certainly earn less, unless suddenly global income dramatically increases). As we expect some people will keep creating monoskilled monsters, the bunch of top end salary players (who again, are not the best players) will be monoskilled. This means that the best players, the better trained multiskilled ones, will earn less.

So in the end we'll see the best players being sold for the highest prices. These players will never earn 500k/wk since the monoskilled monsters will always fill the top end of the salary scale. This means the best players are affordable for top teams within their salary budget, thus their market price will go up. It's logical that the monoskilled top end salary monster will be sold for less since he's a worse player (and got a higher salary).


(136516.221)

question this.

Last edited by Rycka at 10/16/2010 9:54:09 AM

This Post:
00
158188.122 in reply to 158188.121
Date: 10/16/2010 9:59:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404

Patrick,in certain roles to have the best players you had to have the highest salaries.
While I can agree about guards,for example,when we look at center poistion,I still don't see what skills a pure center should have over ID,IS,and Reb(i know that a center with the guards skills will perform better with the same salary,but is almost impossible sometimes to train that skills,without stopping the growth of the player in the primary skill because of the salary.
In BB the monoskilled players will never win something,but the triskills players yet,and they could be sustainable



(136516.222)

question this

This Post:
00
158188.123 in reply to 158188.122
Date: 10/16/2010 10:05:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
if you don't see what skills a pure center should have, it doesn't mean that you know which players are the best players.

This Post:
00
158188.125 in reply to 158188.123
Date: 10/16/2010 10:15:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
if you don't see what skills a pure center should have, it doesn't mean that you know which players are the best players.

OH Well,can you explain what skills a pure center should have over IS,ID and Reb?

Advertisement