BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Tactics Poll

Tactics Poll

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
197140.12 in reply to 197140.5
Date: 9/26/2011 8:59:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
Because if your best player who takes most of the shots has bad GS, your team will be terrible.

This Post:
00
197140.13 in reply to 197140.12
Date: 9/26/2011 9:47:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
172172
I think we all agree that good GS is better than bad GS... All I was saying is that your statement that your team has good GS is irrelevant for the choice of tactics.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
197140.15 in reply to 197140.14
Date: 9/27/2011 1:22:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Hey again. I know some managers who have tried to specifically design their teams for specific offences which includes:

* obviously several teams with all high IS to play LI

* great passing teams that play motion

* teams with mismatches and good passing (so big men with great JS and JR as well as guards with great IS) so that they can play patient with great effect

* teams with great driving, passing, handling, IS and JS players to play motion - there was a famous team in Australia run by a female manager that exclusively ran it and was very sucessful

Most common by far is the LI option because the players needed are a dime a dozen and it is super easy to create and manage the team and because the supposed counter the 2/3 zone is busted (yes I know BB-Charles if we all had players with prodigious SB it would work fine but we don't).

This Post:
00
197140.16 in reply to 197140.15
Date: 9/27/2011 5:12:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i would rate OD at the big higher then SB for the 2-3, because i had some good succes with the 2-3 zone and no good shot blocker. And i don't say OD values in double digits.

From: MetallicA

This Post:
00
197140.18 in reply to 197140.17
Date: 9/27/2011 9:17:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
IMO IS has little to do with LI success, because it has little to do with success of inside shots. It is a factor.....but in my experiments, like running LI today and watching what happened with my players shooting....IS was not as important for success as other things. Not at all.


I totally disagree with that one. IS is (in my opinion) the most important skill to make LI work well.

From: Sharooz
This Post:
00
197140.20 in reply to 197140.19
Date: 9/28/2011 4:34:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
I've beaten better teams playing low post m2m vs look inside m2m a couple of times...
I choose princeton however, had great success with it as an outside tactic, works better for my team then motion atleast...

This Post:
00
197140.21 in reply to 197140.20
Date: 9/28/2011 10:52:41 AM
Carbó VB Ploiesti
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
147147
That's weird.
To me that's viceversa. Princeton works like hell, while with motion I had some pretty good matches against stronger teams...

Anyhow... my question remains valid:why doesn't anyone trust the new tactics?

This Post:
11
197140.22 in reply to 197140.21
Date: 9/28/2011 11:21:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
The new offencive tactics are for teams who have one solid player. Most of the forum visitors tend to gather a team instead of having just one superstar. I have used 4+1 defences against a few teams with a clear single scorer and they work well. Their usage is very situational, just like 1-3-1 or 2-3.

Last edited by Kukoc at 9/28/2011 11:21:16 AM

Advertisement