BuzzerBeater Forums

my exact point man. but want to decrease the ATG's who ever heard of like 3 ATG's? Isn't it supposed to be one ATG every once in a while...? but keep the HoF and MVPs and p,. allstars and superstars the same, just please get rid of those bench warmers! anyways I don't like stars like p. all stars+

Currently there are about eight draftees per season (as far as I remember) that are P.-Allstar or above.

Increasing this number means two things:
1) No (AKA - less) need to invest at scouting points, as the chances becomes even higher to get them just by luck.

2) When increasing the amount of good players, it means that what once had been exceptionaly great is now just common (generally speaking).
And then one will ask more of the MVP players instead current P.-Allstar player...

look at the title, I'm not asking for p. allstars and up to get increased, I'm asking for stars and all stars. So.......I'd like a allstar rather than a stupid bench guy.

It is not really important what is the level you set/asked.
The answer is the same.

There are enough players that you can draft with this skill.
Raising this bar has the same affects written before.

Hence, this is not a suggestion that I support.

There are around 18 player with a potential of Star or higher in a draft. More than one third of the draft !
It means that even a blind has great chance to pick one of them in one of his three picks.

It is not as if the NBA draft are all "success".
About a third of the draft peeks (and actually much less) will have a career on the NBA.
Not to mention being a "Star" there.

Quite the opposite.
The amount of players that are what one will call Superstars (of their division) are higher than in the NBA.

As already written - increasing the amount of good players will mean that there will be no reason to invest in the draft.

I bet that anyone who support this bad suggestion does not invest, almost at all, in scouting points.

Last edited by Pini פיני at 8/14/2012 3:28:00 AM

ok what about thesuggestion at the bottom of my post about having at least 1 good player in your starting roster? is that a good one, I feel bad for those newbies who have 6th men and benchwarmers as a "Good young talented " guy to start with your team? I say at least 1 guy! of all star + potential and 4k plus salary.....do you like that one?

ok what about thesuggestion at the bottom of my post about having at least 1 good player in your starting roster? is that a good one, I feel bad for those newbies who have 6th men and benchwarmers as a "Good young talented " guy to start with your team? I say at least 1 guy! of all star + potential and 4k plus salary.....do you like that one?

1) In general, I think that a user that joins the game should be competitive from the start.
What does it means in terms of players, etc. is arguable.
Currently a user who joins the game (not in a micro-nation) gets enough money to buy those types of players you wrote.

2) I even support something stronger than that;
In the NBA a new team gets to choose players from any team with some limitations - franchise cannot be chosen, a maximum of players from a single team, etc.

The same needs to apply here with some changes.
When being promoted (or when starting a new team / joining this game), you will be part of this process.

The skills will not be shown except what you can already examine.

For every player you choose, the other team gets to choose from your roster a player.

There will be the same rules of franchise player/s and a maximum of a single player from a team that one can choose.

All of the players of a relegated team can be taken by that promoted team. In turn, they will choose players from the division they are being relegated into (and after the process done by the promoted one).

As currently users just sell their best players when off-season starts for them, the definition could be changed to include money that each team received for selling a player during last X weeks, in case a player with this value had not been bought at this time.

This will also assist making this game a more competitive one.

3) A simpler version is to take the average revenue (of all teams during all season long) at the division one is promoted into, and defined it as a bonus, in a sense that as long as the promoted team's revenue is lower than that, you will get (during its first season at that division) the delta as a bonus.

Last edited by Pini פיני at 8/14/2012 4:57:23 AM