BuzzerBeater Forums

Put two of these on SF and PF and play Outisde isolation or R&G.
Put one of these on PF and play Patient.
Put two of these on PF and C and play Look inside.

Best PFs have OD starting at 10-12, so HA always come...handy.

Aynway, it's an idea me and my friend had and he is building a team like this (he started with SF though) and I'm mentoring him. I won't disclose skills of his future guards, but the analogy with the player above is the same (switch positions).

If you think that player is trash, that's ok with me. Just don't say nobody is trying anything different.

Last edited by Koperboy at 9/14/2012 9:26:29 AM

OK, I'll ask you one thing and I'll see if we disagree here. Do you think JR is indispensable for Motion?

And answering other stuff...

but the LI guys keep winning. That is what I am saying.

Because building a team that can win LI from bottom up takes time.

So good luck ,and don7t come whining to me if you lose eveyrthing, your palyers are worht 1/10th what you paid to train them...and so forth and so on.

I won't, that's for sure. I sort the players into two categories: The ones that I will eventually sell and ones that will play in my team. I don't care what latter are worth because they fill a specific role in my team and they help me win games, bring attendance and merchandise. Also my friend is eager to see if he can build a team that can end LI's era, so he doesn't mind about player's price either.

OK I wanted to link to a player, but I see he's on market right now, so...with IS only at 10, he achieved FG% of 0.615 in Slovenian D.III (with Look inside of course). That was possible only because his HA was also 10, and his JS was 7. Btw, he had 2 in PA.

If this isn't enough for you, then don't look farther than Miroslav Capella. He has very high HA and has high FG% even in B3.

I'm not sure why these high IS players are your golden boys to run something other than LI...seems odd to me.

For flexibility of tactics.

JR is needed for motion. besides which, if your plan is to run motion, I'll just play 3-2 and you will lose (assuming TSPs of players around same levels)...badly.... unless you play an LI or LP...which only shows how overpowered it is.

So you haven't seen games where PF takes most of the shots in Motion? Can you explain why is that?

That's what made us (Slovenia) an easy target at Eurobasket 2009. We had good bigs, but guards were poor shooters. Everyone was playing 2-3 against us and we couldn't drive or pass to our bigs, so we had been shooting 3s...missing tons of them.

In BB you play a 2-3 zone and suddenly every guard becomes a Steve Nash / Reggie Miller hybrid.

In BB you play a 2-3 zone and suddenly every guard becomes a Steve Nash / Reggie Miller hybrid.

That's sad but true.