BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Better LI C?

Better LI C?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: HAHA

This Post:
00
242040.12 in reply to 242040.11
Date: 5/26/2013 2:01:58 AM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
It is no doubt that IS, ID, Reb and SB are important skills for big men. How about the importance of outside defence (OD), handling (HND), driving (DR) and passing (PA)? Which one rates the most important?

In "Look Inside" strategy, I would put DR>HND>PA>OD ... I put driving is more important as this would make him shoot better (better shot selection). Handling would keep his TO and foul numbers in control, so this would keep him in the game.

I rate OD and PA in a lower priority, not because they are less important, but because those guard skills take longer time to train up. Time-wise, I would train one-on-one for forward to boost the DR and HND skills.

Last edited by HAHA at 5/26/2013 2:05:23 AM

From: HAHA

This Post:
00
242040.14 in reply to 242040.13
Date: 5/26/2013 8:22:01 AM
HAHA001
IBL
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
Really? When I drafted a decent 18 years old player, I always train ID -> Reb and some one-on-one in the first season. Then Reb -> IS and some one-on-one in the second season. Therefore, he could be 11ID 11Reb 11IS at 20 years old.

When would you train passing and OD for centre? At 18 years old or after ID,Reb and IS achieve certain level?

This Post:
00
242040.16 in reply to 242040.1
Date: 5/26/2013 6:42:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
I would prefer the first player as my PF, and then #2 as my C with a little less in handling and increase that IS.

This Post:
00
242040.18 in reply to 242040.17
Date: 5/30/2013 12:24:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455

I want much less IS


You want lower IS for LI offense? Personally, I think that's completely backwards. I think that should be the highest skill of them all.

This Post:
00
242040.20 in reply to 242040.19
Date: 5/30/2013 10:13:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
A first couple those linked to teams that actually had terrible IS numbers in the boxscore, 9's and 10's so they haven't invested in IS at all. The next 2 linked to teams that put up 12's. In in every example you won a ugly, low scoring game as a result.

None of those numbers are teams that have invested heavily in IS my friend. 13's are a minimum but the top teams are putting up 14's and 15's. Like these 2 teams:

(58832733)

(58832734)

Of course everyone has different theories on what works best.

Message deleted
Advertisement