BuzzerBeater Forums

"Scores" implies "tactic"

If your PG has better driving and inside shot than the defensive skills on the defender and your tactic is Look Inside .. for sure you PG is going to shot and score more ... ¿it's not obvious?

The fact that a role in the starting five is to dribble and pass doen't mean he can't shot (stephen curry, Russel Westbrok, and on and on)


Also

The position of PF the main role is to help rebound and defense inside ... does it means he can't pass? NJo, it doesn't mean it (Pau Gasol, Draymon Green and many others)

Theres no point talking about this.

You can hace a PG like Ricky Rubio, to pass the ball as imaginable and inimaginable as possible or you can have a Zack Lavine playing at PG just to see him shooting his shoes out.

The main role still the same.


So whatever the tactic you're going to use, you're going to need one profile or another. Even if you know a bit about you rivel you will see that putting some guy with a role way out of position in the game you will get a better result

I think for the last 2 years in the NBA they called it "Go for the small ball" using 3 Guards and 1 SF and 1 PF ...

Few years Ago there was a fantastic ofensive triangle using 2 7 footers and a talented SG ...

So...

A PG scores like a SG IF you want and he can.

The fact that a role in the starting five is to dribble and pass doen't mean he can't shot (stephen curry, Russel Westbrok, and on and on)

And does it make them more important players to their teams? Well, YES!

Let's go again ...

Depending on wich tactics you play

Harden last year was a crappy player but a great scorer

This year, new coach new tactics and his doing triple doubles amost each game...

If you don't wanna see it, your problem.

I'm out