BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 6 Changes

Season 6 Changes

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
40617.120 in reply to 40617.110
Date: 7/30/2008 7:12:22 AM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
He is refering to Division I teams that do not have large arenas and depend on TV money. Other than tv money and larger arenas how is it that he would make so much more money than you? That is his point - if there is no advantage in TV money and he has the same a rean that a lower division team has then he is going to have a great deal of trouble under the new changes.


more attendance at higher prices, for example?

This Post:
00
40617.121 in reply to 40617.114
Date: 7/30/2008 8:14:51 AM
New York Jests
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
I don't think the answer is to speed up the "end of the game." Players will eventually reach their peaks and decline, it is only seaosn 6, give it 4 more and you will see what they had been reaching for this whole time.

This Post:
00
40617.122 in reply to 40617.20
Date: 7/30/2008 8:52:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
will we get the money of the championship ? its not fair that a team won't get the money of the championship and will only get the difficult money terms of the highest league... thank you :)

This Post:
00
40617.123 in reply to 40617.117
Date: 7/30/2008 10:27:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
not really new
but they really don't give answer =[

i think U20 but the question is if it's inclusive age 20 or not ..


If I had to guess (and please note that I am stressing the "guess" part), I'd say U21, but U20 is possible also.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
40617.124 in reply to 40617.123
Date: 7/30/2008 11:02:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I think age 21 it's too late for junior team .. 20 it's reasonable.. (i mean that 20 years old players be allowed to play in the junior team , so if it's U21 so ok .. but players in age 21 it's too late for now I think..)

because on average, the players age in the mature National Teams is something like 22-23 .. and 21 players need to be enough goods for the mature ..(in this part/step of the game)

not thus? ;)

This Post:
00
40617.125 in reply to 40617.124
Date: 7/30/2008 11:42:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I'm going to ::sigh:: bring up Hattrick here.

HT basically allows "juniors" to run 4 seasons, from 17-20. Like HT, BB runs their NTs on a one-season-qualifying, one-season-final-tournament basis, and U21 would make sense for that, allowing all U21 teams to have 2 full cycles in the system if possible.

Please note that I do not know if this will be the plan, this is pure speculation on my part.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
40617.126 in reply to 40617.110
Date: 7/30/2008 12:18:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
He is refering to Division I teams that do not have large arenas and depend on TV money. Other than tv money and larger arenas how is it that he would make so much more money than you? That is his point - if there is no advantage in TV money and he has the same a rean that a lower division team has then he is going to have a great deal of trouble under the new changes.

He never suggested that there are Div ! teams not currently making money, he suggested that there are Div I teams that may be in trouble when the changes take effect.

Exactement.
And he has proven my point - I play in a higher level league with (supposedly) higher quality. How do I afford that quality if I'm making the same amount of money the person above makes?

This Post:
00
40617.127 in reply to 40617.125
Date: 7/30/2008 12:20:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
in my opinion would be great if the border for junior NT would be 22 years..

doesn't matter in which situation we are now - 19y drafts would have under U21 system only 3 seasons, which would destroy for junNT anyone who will be unlucky injuried in overall by these 3 seasons for a 2months and that sometimes happens

make from the injury a barier for a junior national team isn't good idea in my opinion

edit: in advance - we would not have anyone multiskilled.. 3 seasons are for a main skill only, Junior NT matches would be very poor and unvariable

Last edited by Iordanou at 7/30/2008 12:26:50 PM

This Post:
00
40617.128 in reply to 40617.127
Date: 7/30/2008 12:35:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
There really isn't a "main skill" in BB.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
40617.129 in reply to 40617.128
Date: 7/30/2008 12:47:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
There really isn't a "main skill" in BB.

*casts away his dream of winning games on free throws alone*
/joke

This Post:
00
40617.130 in reply to 40617.128
Date: 7/30/2008 1:06:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
right .. 3 seasons it's a long time for training player .. in bb have very good players already at age 19 .. players are suitable to play at junior NT .. part of them even plays in the mature team ..

"junior" it's not age 22 .. in this age they has to be qualified to play in the mature ..
I think U21 it's reasonable to junior team .. not less, not more ..

Advertisement