you are just denying obvious evidence.
lol no you just want to pass opinions as facts and provided 'evidence' with limited context once again
Take any 31-33 yo
Take only the 33yo. It should be abundantly clear players can receive training at 30 and 31, although it's not much. Most of the players who are in a guard formula despite having high IS would need to get to 11 potential to get capped, therefore most of them respond to training.
And of course the changes are not only for IS, but it is the main component of the salary increase.
That's a reasonable statement, but it's not what was discussed here. The discussion was about LI guards impact to which you replied with examples claiming it was between 5% and 8.8% clearly qualifying your selection based on IS.
The change appears to have an impact on other secondaries (most likely at least RB) on guards not just IS as you don't get a discernible pattern based on IS for players with similar but different IS, especially in the 6-8 bracket. Note that I'm not saying they increased the contribution of RB or ID, it might well be that they decreased it, but they must have changed or some primaries must have changed.
The salary changes for 33yo guards I've checked are anywhere from -4% to +7% but it's clearly not dependent on IS alone.
And since the rest of the inside skills are usually a lot lower, it's entirely possible that the change equally affected other inside skills but you see IS as the largest contributor because you selectively picked your sample and other inside skills are not usually that high. There are no guards with 6 IS and 17 RB, so this is very difficult to check for other inside skills at the levels you checked for IS. Do you follow?
But I guess you would still deny them since you are trolling on this subject since the beginning.
Not really, I'm very confident that the updated values will be accurate as they were in the past, but you have already changed the bet from "IS is the reason" to "IS is the most important cause".
Also calling someone troll on the forums is a breach of the game manual apparently for which I received warnings before. Foto?
Stop talking about a declining 38 yo player, whom you don't know the decimals and you guess his new salary based on a formula (which never had been precise to 2-4% as you claim by the way, especially for uncommon players).
Ok. I'll be the adult here and drop Chaperon. I just want to remark that nobody has explained rationally how suddenly the estimate is off by so much even assuming Foto was completely wrong about the sub 50k statement (60.3k/56.4k*1.08-1=15.5%).
Also it's worth noting once and for all that a player like Chaperon is easier to achieve than other builds with a lot of outside power (and notably 20 or more OD). There were at least 3 HoF draftees at 6'5'' and 6'6'' last season for whom that build was achievable in training simulators. Normally I can't get to my goals in the simulators or the player caps if I test distinctly outside oriented builds for 6'0'' players...
Last edited by Lemonshine at 12/10/2016 8:25:35 AM