It does not work here because it based on salary's in contract. You cant over extend if purchase a player off the market, because you already have paid his contract salary in the market.
But in BB world that is not the case because you pay him twice you cannot base it previous players training as a excuse to exempt a tax, that a false hood. Because players have been on teams for10-12 season which should be more than what we are getting , Im estimating 122K$ thats div 5. When we buy him for 2 mill on the market he is paid that in salary directly, its off the books., But on BB hen when he joins the team you pay him week wage salary for infinite( paid twice). Which equals being paid twice which pushes teams over the team the cap. Which is what i explained very well..
*Once a year, teams can use a mid-level exception (MLE) to sign a player to a contract for a specified maximum amount. The amount of the MLE and its duration depend on the team's cap status. The MLE is $5 million for a duration of four years for teams that are over the cap either before or after the signing, but did not pay a luxury tax in the previous season. Teams without cap room that paid tax in the previous season have an MLE of $3 million with a three-year duration. Teams with cap room, previously ineligible for the MLE, have a new MLE of $2.5 million with a two-year duration. The MLE is frozen at the stated levels through the 2012–13 season, after which it increases by 3% per season (with the percentage based on the initial amount of the exception, and not compounded.
Again bb does not a have market rule. it has team rule. it has free agent market on BB well waive selling market then there need to rules for it. If there are going to tax on a soft cap.
Before the 2011 CBA, the MLE was equal to the average NBA salary for all teams over the cap. Teams with cap room were previously ineligible for the MLE.The Mid-Level Exception for the 2008–09 NBA season was $5.585 million. The MLE was $5.854 million for the 2009–10 NBA regular season
BB does not have contracts on players ,But give team a cap which is "soft cap" on training which is a false hood because player market value. what he worth in today is not, what he worth to your team. Which lead to rules above an below
The bi-annual exception was used to sign any free agent to a contract starting at $1.672 million. Like the mid-level exception, the bi-annual exception was also split among more than one player, and was used to sign players for up to two years, with raises limited to 8% per year. This exception was referred to as the "$1 million exception" in the 1999 CBA, although it was valued at $1 million for only the first year of the agreement. "Karl Malone rule"
There is no free agent is un/ or restricted free agents on BB. If they are going to make a tax on player this plays a bigger part.
This tax does not work with out contracts the contract are infinite on BB, so in small we playing the player twice for very long time. Based on market value/training value/trading value, So in small It would best to sell to get huge heavy end in purchasing power. In small "Farm talent" and keep cheap roster
Which is what I said before in my post as team having a good player they sell for more because of LI/Lp dominance which would raise their caps to 125% in revenue to purchase also team buying power.
We can't add a real life rule to BB and neglect the whole rule and just cherry pick the rule.. To much to the rule for it to function.. we can say BB is not real life, then why are you using real life rules.?
If there is team salary cap(soft cap) then there should be a market cap and free agent as well. If we pay the buyer fee that is his salary to start. Because I bought him from the owner. I paid his salary in purchase regardless of the worth. The market will correct it if too cheap or too high.
Lie I said before fix the tactic balance and m
Last edited by Mr. Glass at 1/1/2014 12:51:07 PM