BuzzerBeater Forums

If you go to the training page, select passing and then select "team" your center will get passing training. If you choose not to train this way, or by playing your center at either PG or Sg, which is also an option, then you choose not to. Do not reply with some blather about that not being possible or feasible or efficient. I don't care. You CAN train passing for your centers. I have and do.

This player (3201582), a backup on my team, averages 5 assists in 22 minutes per game.

You are dead wrong in your analysis of the SPurs. Parker ran circles around the whole league that year. Manu was great as well, but if he didn't have Parker necessitating help d almost every possession he wouldn't have had half the success he did. And my point about the Lakers was that they had a guy named Kareem Abdul Jabbar playing with Magic. Kareem was twice the player Shaq or Duncan or Howard have ever dreamt of being. No team wins the title with only a great center or a great point gurad. The Bulls are the closest to ever winning being a one-man team, because Jordan was a one-man team.

Hello,

I loose and I have some difficulties to understand it... I choose a defense "man to man" and his defense is not appropried (i play R&G et he choose a zone "2-3")...

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/17982936/boxscore.aspx

My evaluations are best and I am better in "Points per 100 Shots" !!!

What's the solution ? Take player with just secondary and no shoot, no defense ???

The result are ridiculous sometimes !!!

I think you're OT, we are discussing here about the efficency between outside and inside attack, in your case both played outsde (an your opponet had better effort than you), there is another thread where discussing about it. The only point can be useful here is how a 2-3 defense can work against an outside attack...

Still the efficiency is a very big factor when we train. Why for example we dont train a 6'0 player with great starting big men skills as a big men? Again u can train 7 guard skills without having to put u r player out of his position, but big men only 4.

Parker is great 15 foot and in player with amazing quickness/speed etc, but has never been considered as a great PG. Yes his drivings helps to open space for the shooters, but he is never considered as a great PG. Great player yes, great PG NO. For sure u cant win the ring alone, as good player as u r u need great players next to u but my statement was ''what's the last time that a team with PG being the best player have won the ring?''. U can argue that Jabbar is better than Tim,(even if am not sure that i agree but its not what we are debating) and maybe u r right, but the fact is that the Dunkan always considered by far the best player of the Spurs. Magic was considered the best player of those Lakers teams too.

Jordan was the only 1 who won rings without a dominant big man, but that again Rodman will be insulted even if he was the best role player ever, but still a role player.

All those those great big men had 1 common aside from the other things. Everybody had great passing skills something that we cant train with efficient way.

Well.. He had an amazing outside defense and your guards just couldn't put the ball inside. My opinion.

The error tactics are in the two side...

If improving passing in your big men improves your team's performance, then it is worth it. It has been for my team. I spent the first six weeks of last season training FT shooting. Last year in the Finals I won the title on a buzzerbeater in a game where I shot 18-21 from the line. Efficient training? Probably not in most people's eyes. Good for my team winning the title? Undoubtedly.
So it is up to you. If you are training your big men to sell so you can make money on the TL, then remember that the Tl list is searched by lots of dummies who think an unbalanced scoring machine is worth millions.If you are trying to create a winning team, think about the skills necessary to win in basketball.

My PG:
Handling: prolific
Driving: sensational Passing: prominent

His outside defense is amazing ok, but his averall scoring and inside scoring suck and my Offensive Flow mediocre (medium) vs his Offensive Flow average (high)

Game engine is giving to much important to outside player it is not good in my opinion...

this is probably moving a little off topic, but for your team - a first division team in a tough country that has two top inside players - a pg with a passing level of 10 is inadequate. based on my experience, you will roughly need a pg with level 13 passing or higher and a sg with at least 10. otherwise, the good inside shot opportunities are going to be few and far between.

PS: Please show me a center with close to 5 blocks a game, and don't come with your logic that there are fewer blocks in a game with lot more shot attemps then in the realkity - because normally the number of blocks raise with the anumber of attembed blocks and get not reducing even when forrest takes this logic toargue for his reduction with the last change.

And why exactly do you expect to find a player in BB that blocks twice as many as shots as the current leader in the NBA?

PS: Please show me a center with close to 5 blocks a game, and don't come with your logic that there are fewer blocks in a game with lot more shot attemps then in the realkity - because normally the number of blocks raise with the anumber of attembed blocks and get not reducing even when forrest takes this logic toargue for his reduction with the last change.

And why exactly do you expect to find a player in BB that blocks twice as many as shots as the current leader in the NBA?

Mark Eaton blocked 5,5 blocks per game one season, and in buzzerbeater there are more shots taken so the average should be higher. Ok this record was very good, but fewer games(higher prohability of an xceptional good season), and more played season then the NBA should also lead to higher average.