I get the feeling our NT is being run based on what you would do.
Paranoid much???? Who are these PGs you are talking about?
Tagawa? Swoosh already explained that one....Tagawa has an awful ID. Hell, I tried to buy Tagawa to come off my bench, but I surely wouldn't start him. In fact, I start Martis, an old FCTB PG.
I faced many of these in the b3 over 3 seasons. In that time I put out the best result ever in active nippon teams.
I gave you props for that but it is all about the draw, and drawing a 11K and a 26K ranked teams must have been nice.
But you made the Final 16...Props well earned.
If our team is only doing what you would do this season. Then maybe besided setting the strategies yo uwould set, it is also getting the results you would, hockey sticks. Consider the possiblity that your theory is mistaken.
Hey...I think you slipped and hit your head.
I DON'T RUN THE NT TEAM!!! I like rebounding at the SF spot just like about 20K other users. Are they running the NT team too????
I told you about my theory, and to run my theory, you have to have two 19 rebounders and a beast(14IS,15ID,13+REB) at SF.
I do know this, the possession after an OREB is juiced(better % of it going in) and they lead to tip ins which = easy buckets or fouls. This is what a lot of teams are doing. The reason is not to many people have 12+ ID at the SF spot if they have a PG/SF there. And the mismatch of a 15 IS on a 9 ID while running LI is much better than a 15 JS 12 JR hitting a three while running LI. And 99% of people run LI.
And this was my strategy....While running LI and defending LI.....How many three are shot on average? Maybe 12, 15 at the high end. So the missmatch will never be outside,(unless LI isn't run) but it will be the 15 IS at SF going against a weak ID while RUNNING LI. The GE is about mismatches. And rebounding is an easy one to exploit. And this isn't only my idea...Many people have this idea.