BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > L.I or L.P

L.I or L.P

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
105684.13 in reply to 105684.11
Date: 8/20/2009 5:34:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
- at the beginn of the offense, your player have the target to get a good shot, and start with a optimistic approach(lets take 60%)


This target is determined by your inside shot rating and opponent's defensive strat + defense skill?

e.g say if i have strong inside shot vs man to man, atrocious inside defense, my accuracy % will be higher.. like 80%?

This is a very interesting logic...

Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill (10080211), averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
This Post:
00
105684.14 in reply to 105684.13
Date: 8/20/2009 5:48:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
This target is determined by your inside shot rating and opponent's defensive strat + defense skill?


as i said before, just a quote form the rules(it time that you could switch to english rules on the rules page :():

The central part of the game engine is how the half court offense/defense works. The general idea is that a team gets a series of opportunities to score. What kind, and what the quality of those opportunities are is a function of the offense they are running, the matchups between the offensive players and their defenders. A player must decide whether the opportunity presented is good enough to take a shot… this of course changes as a function of amongst other things… the shot clock, the players experience, the score of the game, the history of the quality of shots the team has seen recently, the offense the team is running, and whether that rookie shooting guard of yours thinks he knows better than the coach does how good he is at making jump shots.


e.g say if i have strong inside shot vs man to man, atrocious inside defense, my accuracy % will be higher.. like 80%?


i don't think so, i believe i read a post from a BB that the current standing also plays a role. So that they will obvioulsly play more careless against such a week team - maybe you reach such stats if both team struggles that much.

Also i such matches you normally don't have better percentages then 50-60%:

(6169) - thats my experience with unbalanced matchups.

Edit: this one is even better example ->(5340)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/20/2009 5:49:50 AM

This Post:
00
105684.15 in reply to 105684.14
Date: 8/20/2009 9:28:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
In general it's better to use slow paced tactics in close games and fast paced tactics in games you expect to win big.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 8/20/2009 9:28:35 AM

This Post:
00
105684.16 in reply to 105684.15
Date: 8/20/2009 12:00:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i won't agree with that

This Post:
00
105684.17 in reply to 105684.16
Date: 8/20/2009 12:51:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
why won't you agree with that? if you are supposed to win big, fast paced tactics give you more opportunities to get shots off, making for higher scores, meaning you should blow them out. if you are an underdog, slowing the game down will mean lower scores, meaning you will at least be in it with a chance at the end to pull out a W.

This Post:
00
105684.18 in reply to 105684.16
Date: 8/20/2009 1:50:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
yea, the rules even hint at that

Fewer possessions in the game also means that scores will be lower, which means that bad teams can stay closer to good ones.




This Post:
00
105684.19 in reply to 105684.17
Date: 8/20/2009 1:52:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
[message=105684.6i] - i explained it here ;)

This Post:
00
105684.20 in reply to 105684.18
Date: 8/20/2009 1:53:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
yea, the rules even hint at that

Fewer possessions in the game also means that scores will be lower, which means that bad teams can stay closer to good ones.



but the quality isn't the same, if you had more possesion and a better percentage you could keep closer to a good/superior opponent who also have more posssesion and the same percentages

This hint never works in my eyes, only for some special teams who have a very good ball contribution.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/20/2009 1:54:37 PM

This Post:
00
105684.21 in reply to 105684.20
Date: 8/20/2009 4:48:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Just because people ignored their Offensive Flows a lot (usually that rating is way lower than the other ratings), doesn't mean it isn't true.

It's the same story as with shot blocking, people ignored it and are now complaining the new effect is still bad. Hey an inept shotblocker won't get 7 blocks a game, just like teams playing with superior ratings compared to their offensive flow won't be able to execute slow paced tactics effectivly.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 8/20/2009 4:49:09 PM

This Post:
00
105684.22 in reply to 105684.21
Date: 8/20/2009 4:59:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Also, the idea of a slow paced tactic doesn't necessarly have to be a higher score for yourself. Keeping the ball longer than usual means your opponent won't have the ball that much. When you're opponents plays fast pace tactics you will have the ball most of the time. This teams their score will belower, especially if their looks aren't that great.

This Post:
00
105684.23 in reply to 105684.22
Date: 8/20/2009 7:40:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
Also, the idea of a slow paced tactic doesn't necessarly have to be a higher score for yourself. Keeping the ball longer than usual means your opponent won't have the ball that much.

That is a very good point you've raised. I'll note that for my next match. Tho i did lose to a recent PL game against a Run & Gun player but I'd blame my outside D.

what do you mean by their "looks"?

Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill (10080211), averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
Advertisement