BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Game Shape

Game Shape

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
105943.13 in reply to 105943.12
Date: 8/24/2009 1:03:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Also there is no need at all to question the rules time by time, which seems to be one of your favorites (forgive me if I'm wrong). The rules are right, unless proven wrong.


in my eyes the past effect of the last week is the current game shape ;)

Or did you get a player with GS 3 in one week to GS 9 with optimum minutes, i say no like you don't get a player within one week to GS 3. So my modell clearly fit with the rules.

Since the game shape is reset at offseason there is no way to conclude anything about the influence of past weeks from that research, since the past weeks can't be included in there due to the reset.


the different progress of same minutes, seems to me a clear factor for randomness especially because there aren't no past weeks - thats why i choose that ;)Later on the gs seems to be behaven foor me like at the beginning.

Even i don't expect a bad background form for player who have from beginning on good minutes.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
105943.14 in reply to 105943.13
Date: 8/26/2009 6:41:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
It's a combination of two weeks minutes. Perhaps it's not the best to play 0 and 120. But it looks the same to play 40-80 compared to 60-60.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
105943.15 in reply to 105943.14
Date: 8/26/2009 7:57:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
not with my team^^

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
105943.16 in reply to 105943.15
Date: 8/27/2009 2:41:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Then youre team is "DIFFERENT" :) You seem to have a team form that we can compare with "the usual omg how did I lose that thread..." :P

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
105943.17 in reply to 105943.16
Date: 8/27/2009 5:26:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
are they stats about your theory?

Because also in my time as nt, i don't see that evidence, and i'm still integrated in the german one and we are often angry about the minutes.

40 and 80 aren't killerminutes and you could have luck with it, but 80/60 oder 40/60 is better then 80/40 because then you mess up two weeks.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/27/2009 5:27:46 AM

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
105943.18 in reply to 105943.17
Date: 8/28/2009 2:03:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Yes luck and random, are both part of the game. You are out of the playoffs, why not try it with the 2 weeks we have left?

From: inimene

This Post:
00
105943.19 in reply to 105943.18
Date: 8/28/2009 4:33:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
You're also out of PO.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
105943.20 in reply to 105943.19
Date: 8/28/2009 6:06:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
You seem to miss the point. I have tested it. It was a suggestion for him to test it.

From: inimene

This Post:
00
105943.21 in reply to 105943.20
Date: 8/28/2009 6:12:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Oh, you already tested it. But why don't you test 0-120 now? Should be the same effect.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
105943.22 in reply to 105943.21
Date: 8/28/2009 6:15:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Because I don't have to do everything for you. And I will never have that kind of minute distribution. It would be even hard to imagine why would you need a minute distribution like that. Even if you have an injury and you play 120 - 0, then next week you would need 120 again to keep the game shape normal. Better to take the temporary fall and even out youre minutes.

From: inimene

This Post:
00
105943.23 in reply to 105943.22
Date: 8/28/2009 6:23:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
So why did you want that CrazyEye would test 80-40?

Advertisement