BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Super supporter

Super supporter (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
163090.13 in reply to 163090.12
Date: 11/3/2010 8:49:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
Yes I do, but one league game per week is enough. Some realism.:)

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
163090.15 in reply to 163090.14
Date: 11/3/2010 9:10:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
The more options there are that are available to purchase, the more money the site gets, and the more fun the users have. So if there was a way to separate all the supporter features one by one I would love it. But for now, I would love to have the ability to play in multiple PLs. What is the downside for having a super supporer? It probably isn't hard to implement, and brings in more money for the site, and makes the users that want more games happier.

This Post:
00
163090.17 in reply to 163090.16
Date: 11/3/2010 9:51:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Adding this feature doesn't cost you anything though. It won't affect you in anyway. But it will give those that wish to play another game a week the option to do so.

It's not that I have money to throw out the window, its just 20 dollars for 3 months isn't that much for someone in Australia. Obviously it is different for different countries. But surely having the option there wouldn't hurt anyone?

This Post:
00
163090.18 in reply to 163090.17
Date: 11/3/2010 10:10:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
I think that there is worry that by the time every option would cost something. I think as well that you have to get whole pie only by one payment, so this supper supporter thing have to have defined any specific philosophy. And by that I ment virtual or fantasy things.

I thought about that about that now and I think that such fantasy draft would be done between existing players, because there doesnt have to be any hint from developers how such player have to look like. Only they would have changed names, ages, heights and so on to mix them.

From: chihorn
This Post:
00
163090.19 in reply to 163090.18
Date: 11/3/2010 2:46:50 PM
New York Chunks
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
943943
If we're going to be given yet another PL, I would prefer to see something that was a little spicier, a little different (or maybe even a LOT different). For example, if the GE could be adjusted for a specialized PL, how about making a 3-on-3 PL (before each game the teams have to pick their 3 players, maybe a fourth in case of injury, games to 21, winner's outs, etc.)? That would be intriguing. Or maybe a couple of times each week you could submit a player in a game of 21 (4 players each, you know the drill)? Or how about a one-on-one competition?

I was sort of hoping somebody would have taken my queue earlier in this thread and ran with the wild stuff...

Don't ask what sort of Chunks they are, you probably don't want to know. Blowing Chunks since Season 4!
This Post:
00
163090.20 in reply to 163090.19
Date: 11/3/2010 4:13:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I do like those ideas. Would certainly spice things up. I do think my suggestions is considerably easier to implement though.

This Post:
00
163090.21 in reply to 163090.20
Date: 11/3/2010 8:05:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
I think what they should do is to have 2 PL games a week to be in line with the normal leagues as well. Having a PL that tries to emulate the standard leagues of 16 teams in 2 conferences, will take twice as long as we only have 1 game per week instead of 2.

Other options will maybe let us have a PL all star game.

This Post:
00
163090.23 in reply to 163090.7
Date: 11/4/2010 1:16:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
Lol just because your balls didn't drop till you were 20 don't take it out on me :>

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
Advertisement