BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > M2M or 3-2 vs. R'n'G?

M2M or 3-2 vs. R'n'G?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: thylacine

This Post:
00
183697.13 in reply to 183697.11
Date: 5/2/2011 3:11:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Tack Manon!
You've helped so many newbies, so you're used to people not knowing anything. I meant sometimes it's hard to determine who the better scorer is on the opposing team due to changes in their line-ups. In R'n'G there's an outside offensive focus. Does it mean that all (incl PF & C) players take more 3s, or that outside players take more shots or somehow both?

This Post:
00
183697.15 in reply to 183697.13
Date: 5/2/2011 3:29:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
114114
The easiest way to find the opponents strongest scorers/ key players (via rebounds or assists) is by looking at the team stats of the other team to see the averages of every player on their team

This Post:
00
183697.16 in reply to 183697.1
Date: 5/3/2011 4:21:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
I played against the same team in league and won with 3-2, and I lost with bigger ent. in playoffs when I played M2M.

This Post:
00
183697.17 in reply to 183697.16
Date: 5/5/2011 4:47:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/32863878/boxscore.aspx

m2m. The logic was to get a real edge on the glass. High tempo game should provide many RB opportunities, but he surprised me with 2-3 zone.

Thank you for your replies!

This Post:
00
183697.18 in reply to 183697.5
Date: 5/5/2011 11:28:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
play 1-3-1 defense..

This Post:
00
183697.19 in reply to 183697.18
Date: 5/5/2011 5:25:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Yeah, I saw it went "lepo" vs. Klenik, ha. Seriously I-3-1 is horrible.

This Post:
22
183697.21 in reply to 183697.20
Date: 5/5/2011 11:35:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
What?
Because I think the GE is more designed for soccer than basketball.

Why do you think this? The guys that designed this game had hoops in mind from the get-go.

In a zone good defenders in a zone near the rim is good defence/rebouding

Please edit this so that it makes even a bit of sense.

I really have no clue what you are trying to say here even though I have tried very hard to understand what it you mean.

Your final paragraph I sort of understand and I disagree with you. Of course OD is more important for guards and RB is more important for big men, no matter what defensive tactic you are playing. That's how basketball works in general- guards play on the perimeter and big men play in the post. If you want to give me examples of how it doesn't work like that, I can give you 100 to every 1 that says it does.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: thylacine

This Post:
11
183697.23 in reply to 183697.22
Date: 5/6/2011 5:03:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
That what exactly my logic if you play against R'n'G, cause you know for sure your bigs will be spread playing m2m. But you still get a better RB ratings than 3-2. And if one argues that in m2m you have a better control of your man and it's easier to box out, why would you get an increased RB rating in 2-3 zone. Often you see attackers flying left and right to snap RBs vs 2-3 (which is the one zone D that played most), cause it's harder to keep track of attackers.
I agree that ID improves with 2-3 zone, but RB? Not so sure.

Last edited by thylacine at 5/6/2011 5:05:50 AM

Advertisement