BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > mutual salary based rewards...

mutual salary based rewards...

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
218678.14 in reply to 218678.13
Date: 5/29/2012 10:20:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
There is a measure of quality that get's injected in your world rank formula. It's hidden from everyone though.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
218678.17 in reply to 218678.16
Date: 5/29/2012 2:08:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I like some the suggestions and reasoning behind them in your current post. Some I don't like. But I gotta stop discussing those atm, because I'm too pissed at my loss and an injury to my best player. So in light of not cursing I return to forums tomorrow.

This Post:
00
218678.18 in reply to 218678.16
Date: 5/29/2012 3:35:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Personally I don't like the idea of making everyone conform to some narrow set of parameters that someone else has decided is the "right" way to do things.

Nothing about the game is realistic. It does have the most realistic game simulation out there. But that doesn't make it realistic. If a woman is a 4 but is standing in a room of 1s, it makes her the most beautiful woman in the room but it doesn't make her beautiful. So if someone wants to play a game with three players, why not? As Brian has so nicely pointed out in his thread about eliminating injuries,

- PG's playing Center for training (whilst also forcing some poor PF/C to chase him around for 48, but the PG gets to be reassigned to defend another guard)
- spectators basing ticket purchases on a teams prior league game, which is usually on the road. they seem to forget the great time that was had at your last home win.
- coaches that tell their team to "take it easy" before games, sometimes mutually agreeing to do this with other coaches
- the best players in BB world bouncing around from team to team every other week, with arbitrarily high salary requests that they'd rather play in the 4th division (in between NT games, of course)


If you are looking for realism, I suggest Andrew Wyeth.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
11
218678.22 in reply to 218678.20
Date: 5/30/2012 10:14:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Did you suggest that war hammer and other fantasy games are realism? They are the opposite of realism.
I don't agreee with any of this post. Because you want it to be one way doesn't mean that it should be that way. In fact I completely disagree with you so that should show you at least how tough it is to decide for the developers how to go about changes. If they make you happy they make me unhappy. Would that be right? I started playing this game because it was a nice fantasy diversion from the staggering suckiness of reality. Now they are going to make me have twelve players?
The fact is that I up to you to play how you want. I have never once not fielded a team of less than six guys. I could care less about saving the money, which is something you don't get. Not everyone ( but most I assume) cares to work the system for every ounce of advantage they can. And you as someone who rails against all sorts of inequalities and unfairnesses honestly show your true character by the actions you take. If you don't like it, don't do it. Simple as that. What difference does it make if someone else in Romania or Italy is doing it? It's an unrealistic fantasy world where everyone plays hoop, for goodness sake.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
Advertisement