I was wondering where the coach of a medium community with pretty mediocre teams,
You have a bigger userbase and garbage track record of success in B3, much worse than England (3-1 ko teams in the last 5 season 4-3 in the last 10). Bold words coming from a community with more mediocre teams than England. Next
Remind me when England reached a similar achievement?
We don't have a farm system and I would always be opposed to having a farming system in this game. Setting a collective achievement (for the U21!!!) by pushing the boundaries is simply a reflection of your mediocrity as managers individually. At least the Germans do or have tried to do this for their NT, which is a more natural and reasonable endeavour, without most of the negative effects your system produces. Next.
In what right do you call Israeli teams farms without a shred of proof, because they chose to run in a different way from yours?
That's what they are called: teams with the sole or main purpose of training salary monsters for the NT. Typically each farm ends up owning 1 player only because the salary is too big. These are non competitive teams in 90% of their BB life. Next.
It may be a mistake, but it is certainly not an illegitimate decision.
Finally you say something sensible. You lot you could have just said this from the beginning, but the level of hypocrisy and arrogance in your community seems to have no bounds, so you needed me to go to this length in order to admit it.
You are effectively saying if the NT/U21 staff think a player may only have an outside chance of playing in the NT, then you ask the user to train him in a way that is uneconomical and will guarantee the player will never play in the NT. Congratulations for coming out.
I will point out that you started a 114 TSP C at PF with 6 OD and 6 PA 2 JR against Spain. This is the kind of player you are saying should be ruined because he has an outside chance to make the NT (at best).
Trying to give a new coach the chance to train a 2.24 cm player for years at the point guard to give him better secondary skills is almost certainly a recipe for failure.
And yet you asked the other manager to train the PA of his 160k guy at 24yo because with 1 PA he would be unplayable. Now, if the original farm team did that at 18yo for half the time, now that player would have higher passing than he does, a slightly lower salary and would now be trained at a position where he belongs.
Any rational user would make a training plan for his player. He would check how much secondary training he can do before starting on the primaries. A 7'0''+ HoF player will indeed cap anyway after his primary training, unless you spend so long on secondaries that you won't make it in time. So it's a matter of timing. And planning.
Training primaries is easy, rewarding and working, and in the end, also brings in nice money when the player is read
Monoskilled players with bad secondaries don't sell well and cost a lot in salary. 100k for a season is 1.4 million, plus coach, plus youth trainer, plus gym which takes the cost to at least 180k. More if you train with a lvl 6 trainer. That's $2.5m
per season minimum. After you spent that much money for seasons you end up selling for a fraction of your cost. The guy training the 24yo big man out with no PA at PG is paying something similar (160k+ trainer). I wonder if he realises that.
I don't know about you in England, but in Israel, we fight for each user trying to keep the game alive.
Yes and you seem to do this by providing misleading information to those users. A surefire recipe for success down the line!
I prefer suggesting users train the right way and try to succeed in the game. If you have a problem with training being too slow then take it up with Marin, but giving bad and misleading advice to further your own NT/U21 agenda is not good for user retention and people enjoying the game in the long ru