BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Defense Vs. Run and Gun

Defense Vs. Run and Gun

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
30484.13 in reply to 30484.12
Date: 5/14/2008 10:23:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
you rebound skill will drop and depending on how good the rebounding is of your opponent they will get more offensive rebounds. If you have 2 very good rebounders i think you will still have a lot of rebounds and if they have maybe 8 offensive rebounds more then usual but they miss 10 more shot because of the 1-3-1 the tacktick worked.

This Post:
00
30484.14 in reply to 30484.11
Date: 5/14/2008 12:13:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Since it is a tactics choice I'm probably making a mistake in this theory though, anyone could explain me how this defence is supposed to work??


I was wondering this yesterday and i found this http://www.coachesclipboard.net/131zonedefense.html which told me more about it.

I played a R&G team last night, probably the best in my league and i went for 1-3-1, basically becuase i was certain that he would not change his offensive tactic. I have much better inside players than him so i was confident that i would get the vast majority of rebounds still. I was at home too.

Check it out (4248824)

If i thought he might change his tactic, i would've gone for 3-2 zone.


Last edited by Calum at 5/14/2008 12:14:10 PM

This Post:
00
30484.15 in reply to 30484.14
Date: 5/14/2008 12:38:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
hm, as I can see you team has much better players, so your team was stronger nonetheless... I am not convinced the 1-3-1 zone gave you the victory here. I'd liked to have seen the result if both teams would have equal players...

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
30484.16 in reply to 30484.14
Date: 5/14/2008 12:42:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
what i see at this game, your opponent make a lot of TO is this normal with 1-3-1 or maybe normal for your opponent ;)

From: Calum

This Post:
00
30484.17 in reply to 30484.16
Date: 5/14/2008 1:16:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I think Lord of Doom has a valid point. But they do have a better outside team than me.

This is the largest TO i have seen from an opposition and I think that the tactic has got something to do with it. It almost seems like it is a mix between 3-2 and FCP. Although mostly 3-2.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
30484.18 in reply to 30484.17
Date: 5/14/2008 1:22:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
This is the largest TO i have seen from an opposition and I think that the tactic has got something to do with it. It almost seems like it is a mix between 3-2 and FCP. Although mostly 3-2.


It seems like, maybe i go in my archiv and search my old 1-3-1 games(they are pretty old) and lok if there that uch To like here.

But i like the theory with this mix betwenn fcp and 3-2.

This Post:
00
30484.19 in reply to 30484.18
Date: 5/15/2008 11:42:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
hm, I doubt it is. I asume BB would have added to the description for 1-3-1 that it has a higher pace, which they didn't...
(yes I asume too much, it is realy troublesome ;) )

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.