BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Interpretting game results

Interpretting game results (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
7193.13 in reply to 7193.10
Date: 11/14/2007 9:10:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
This is from the Rules:

"Offensive Flow (how well the offense produces assists, avoids turnovers): point guard weighted very heavily, shooting guard weighted medium, small forward weighted medium."

So you are wrong about T/Os not counting.


This Post:
00
7193.14 in reply to 7193.13
Date: 11/15/2007 1:49:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
How do you know what his passing and handling ratings are? I can't see them for my opponents. I can't see their defensive rating either for that matter.

This Post:
00
7193.15 in reply to 7193.14
Date: 11/15/2007 3:24:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
The team ratings in the middle of the box score.

This Post:
00
7193.16 in reply to 7193.15
Date: 11/15/2007 4:25:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
no it doesn't. It shows some vague team generalities, but there is nothing there about passing and handling ratings. It also doesn't show individual player's defensi ve ratings either. I see that one guy got most of those steals. If he had high d efense and was matched up against weak passers and handlers it would make quite a bit of difference.

From: chespirito

To: JayP
This Post:
00
7193.17 in reply to 7193.7
Date: 11/15/2007 9:05:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Ok, for points 1&2, player rating are not meant to compare different players, it is a measure of how that player played compared to his own potential. If my star p layer gets a 6.0 and one of my scrubs gets a 7.0 in a certain game it doesn't mean th e scrub was a better player, just that he fulfilled more of his potential in that game. Player rating is not for comparing different players.
I am new to the game, but my interpretation is that when a sub gets higher rating than the star ter he has actually performed better during the time he was on the field. However, the reason for this is that he played shorter time, and therefore he did not run ou t of stamina. I.e. the sub plyed better when he was on the field (and this i refl ected by the rating), but the starter is still a better player.

This Post:
00
7193.18 in reply to 7193.11
Date: 11/15/2007 10:58:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
913913
I have same problem as my_imaginery_friend;) (1289442)

I think the rati ngs aren´t working right. How I have set my tactics and rosters if I know that rati ngs are useless. I have no idea what is important how does the game working.

And all answers are only talking about nothing...no answer talking about main reaso ns why he lost.

Thx for all more useful answers.

sorry for my english;)

From: brian

This Post:
00
7193.20 in reply to 7193.19
Date: 11/15/2007 2:20:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
That's the biggest upset I've seen in BB.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
7193.21 in reply to 7193.19
Date: 11/15/2007 2:27:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
280280
I dont think he want to fire those guy :x

Transfer History for Daniel Figueras (2556953)
Buyed
Jackson Milicia 02/11/2007 08/11/2007 $78500


Transf er History for Guillermo Pascual (2259270)
Buyed
UNICAJA Malaga 27/10/2007 06 /11/2007 $59000

Ps :Here what it happen when you buy spanish BB players ;D




This Post:
00
7193.22 in reply to 7193.16
Date: 11/15/2007 2:42:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
>>It shows some vague team generalities, <<

They are only 'vague' to you. Read up on the definition of those team indices and perhaps you will get it.

You won 't learn how the game works unless you put in a little effort.

This Post:
00
7193.23 in reply to 7193.18
Date: 11/15/2007 2:54:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I don't have any problem understanding the report of your game. You shot poorly, and had starters come in with a 3.5 and the rest 5's. Shooting poorly is extrao rdinary bad luck, but it happens. Your players received poor grades for the game.

Yo u had better rebounding and that happened. His guys got good grades, so they pla yed better.

If my game report had read like yours does, I would be happy with t he game report in that it reflected the outcome of my game. I see nothing the matt er with your report.



Edited by Your_Imaginary_Friend (11/15/2007 2:55:56 PM CET)

Last edited by Your_Imaginary_Friend at 11/15/2007 2:55:56 PM

Advertisement