BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Kobe or Lebron

Kobe or Lebron

Set priority
Show messages by
From: G3C

This Post:
11
239321.130 in reply to 239321.126
Date: 4/14/2013 6:37:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
No, they didn't! Drexler wasn't on the team until '95, when Portland honored his trade request and traded him to Houston for Otis Thorpe.

Are you going to Seriously Compare Michael Jordan right now? He had himseld along with 2 HOF's on his teams i n Pippen and Rodman. Not even close. Never argued Jordan like you tend to believe.

I killed your 3pt argument because they didn't contribute. I pointed out ppg AND 3pt makes per game. Practice before you preach (cherry picking I mean)

I can't argue this anymore. Your argument is logicless without any fact base behind it, meanwhile I've dismantled ever argument you've laid out

Another point, Wally szczerbiak wasn't a Cavalier in the 2007 championship run like you TEND to believe. he was a part of the SONICS!

Last edited by G3C at 4/14/2013 6:39:56 PM

From: Mr. Glass

To: G3C
This Post:
00
239321.131 in reply to 239321.130
Date: 4/15/2013 12:26:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
the point is they had all star help and won championships. look go look at the p stats non Maxwell had 120-140 3 pts made both years during those those runs..

Mario ellie was shooting 335% sam cassell 295.% kenny smith 405%. Robert horry 325.% scott brook 377%. matt bullard 325% in 1993..

1994 Mario ellie was shooting 398%. sam cassell 330% Kenny smith 429% Robert horry 379% scott brook 371% cycle drexlar 375%

at mininmum of 50 3pts shots taken your sitting here telling me they did nothing. Ill say what your drinking send me a case..

wally left via trade. that year..

From: Mr. Glass

To: G3C
This Post:
00
239321.132 in reply to 239321.130
Date: 4/15/2013 12:30:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
the point is they had all star help and won championships. look go look at the stats V Maxwell had 120-140 3 pts made both years during those those runs..

Mario ellie was shooting 335% sam cassell 295.% kenny smith 405%. Robert horry 325.% scott brook 377%. matt bullard 325% in 1993..

1994 Mario ellie was shooting 398%. sam cassell 330% Kenny smith 429% Robert horry 379% scott brook 371% cycle drexlar 375%

at mininmum of 50 3pts shots taken your sitting here telling me they did nothing. I'll say what ever your drinking send me a case..lol

wally left via trade. that year.. Your siting arguring the fact but the thruth says other wise.. Your initialed to your opinon but it doesn't make it the truth, hakeem had a legion of great 3pt shooters he didn't win that title alone he was focail point of that team same as for david robinson with the spurs.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 4/15/2013 12:33:17 AM

This Post:
00
239321.133 in reply to 239321.132
Date: 4/15/2013 7:54:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
405% is the highest 3 point percentage I've ever seen. I mean, that's even better than taking 1 shot and making 4 of them. Hakeem DID have big help. Sigh.

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
239321.134 in reply to 239321.133
Date: 4/15/2013 8:48:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
405% is the highest 3 point percentage I've ever seen. I mean, that's even better than taking 1 shot and making 4 of them. Hakeem DID have big help. Sigh.


Clearly nobody shot 405% in one season. It must have been more like 25% for 16 seasons.

This Post:
00
239321.135 in reply to 239321.134
Date: 4/15/2013 9:00:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
Sounds a lot like all star Wally!

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
239321.136 in reply to 239321.31
Date: 4/16/2013 6:43:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
199199
Pure basketball skill and athleticism - LeBron
Intangibles - Kobe

This Post:
00
239321.137 in reply to 239321.134
Date: 4/17/2013 4:29:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
405% is 40 percent avg from the 3pt line, 335 is 33.5%.. and no its for 1 season only go check the Houston rockets player rockets stats..

Kenny "the jet" smith lifetime 3pt avg is 399. or is 39% which is very good.



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 4/17/2013 4:34:19 PM

This Post:
33
239321.138 in reply to 239321.137
Date: 4/17/2013 4:39:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
405% is 40 percent


No, 405% is 405 percent, and 40% is 40 percent. They are not the same(*). That's kind of what that funny % character means.

(*) Well, 405% of zero is the same as 40% of zero, but I think we should work on establishing the meaning of percentage before advancing to complicated second-grade math.

This Post:
22
239321.139 in reply to 239321.138
Date: 4/17/2013 4:56:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
I thought % was just another way of writing 010. My bad.

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
11
239321.140 in reply to 239321.138
Date: 4/17/2013 8:05:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
405% is the same as 40% which make what I said correct and no one is stupid so please stop leading it to much nature. You find it funny but I don't because it your being childish like a second grader but let establish the difference before we go deeper the conversation.

Beccuase i don't speak with 2nd graders? if want continue to talk like child the go it alone. becuase im not one nor do play little correct her/ her game for entertainment . Is that clear enough.. You either discuss it like man or not at at all..women talk that kimno or w/e is screwed up name is is doing with little girly jokes. Only woman find funny.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 4/17/2013 8:09:37 PM

Advertisement