BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Shotblocking: Good or Bad?

Shotblocking: Good or Bad?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: SREZ

This Post:
00
205736.134 in reply to 205736.129
Date: 1/12/2012 7:21:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
260260
I see you are bidding on a guy with 16 SB rubbercube ;)

From: rubbercube

To: SREZ
This Post:
00
205736.135 in reply to 205736.134
Date: 1/13/2012 12:07:00 AM
Zwölf
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
687687
Second Team:
Zwölf 2
Looking to the test this thing and perhaps prove something :)

From: Ralph54
This Post:
00
205736.136 in reply to 205736.135
Date: 1/13/2012 1:54:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

This Post:
00
205736.137 in reply to 205736.136
Date: 1/13/2012 6:05:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?

This Post:
11
205736.138 in reply to 205736.137
Date: 1/13/2012 6:20:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?

___________________IS_ ID _RB SB
Salary coefficients are .40 .40 .40 .20 for PF. And .46 .46 .46 .25 for center.

This Post:
00
205736.139 in reply to 205736.138
Date: 1/13/2012 6:23:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?

___________________IS_ ID _RB SB
Salary coefficients are .40 .40 .40 .20 for PF. And .46 .46 .46 .25 for center.

I'm not discussing salary coefficient,do you think SB worth half of IS,ID and REB actually(this is a serious question)?

This Post:
00
205736.140 in reply to 205736.139
Date: 1/13/2012 6:25:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
Don't know.

This Post:
00
205736.141 in reply to 205736.137
Date: 1/14/2012 12:20:52 AM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?


Any consistent evidence to say SB is crap?
Can you show some research to prove your point?

This Post:
00
205736.142 in reply to 205736.141
Date: 1/14/2012 12:30:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?


Any consistent evidence to say SB is crap?
Can you show some research to prove your point?


Nope, I like it. Other people think it's crap so I just had to prove a point.

Advertisement