BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeater Arenas

BuzzerBeater Arenas

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
56772.137 in reply to 56772.136
Date: 2/23/2009 7:22:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
right it's no punishment, it something he earned with good managing skills.


....and something he will continue to earn for a very long time, even with the change.

This Post:
00
56772.138 in reply to 56772.137
Date: 2/23/2009 10:12:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
if he stop winning his away games, this period could be pretty short ;)

The main problem of the system are the huge different betwenn succesful team, and "normal" teams. If he statrts loosing his extra income due the arena is pretty small, but actually he pays for a superior roster and he earns the succes ... But the extra cost for the roster negliates his earning through the arena, so that our balaced aren't that much different each week except the play offs.

This Post:
00
56772.139 in reply to 56772.138
Date: 2/24/2009 2:14:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I guess it is pointless to continue this because we keep going back to any suggestion that isnt status quo is going to get the "he earned it" response. It seems like you are saying that not only should he benefit from a good strategy, but that we must make sure that exact same strategy is always there for him, that we must not limit the future of arenas to so we dont have to rethink any future strategy. Not about punishing a good strategy, its about limiting the dominance of any 1 strategy over all of the others.

From: CitB
This Post:
00
56772.140 in reply to 56772.1
Date: 2/24/2009 8:35:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
some of my thoughts...
i tradet, bb put tax on it...
i went up to first division, bb put tax on it...
i grew my arena, cant wait for a tax...

someone doesnt like me...



Last edited by CitB at 2/24/2009 8:35:39 AM

From: Avirto
This Post:
00
56772.141 in reply to 56772.140
Date: 2/24/2009 8:47:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Maybe tax isn't a good option. Maybe the time of building should expand - If you have 5000 seats and you want to build 2000 it will last 6 days and if you have 40000 seats in your arena and you want to build next 2000 it will last 30 days. It is a proposal.

Last edited by Avirto at 2/24/2009 8:48:06 AM

This Post:
00
56772.142 in reply to 56772.139
Date: 2/24/2009 9:12:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I guess it is pointless to continue this because we keep going back to any suggestion that isnt status quo is going to get the "he earned it" response. It seems like you are saying that not only should he benefit from a good strategy, but that we must make sure that exact same strategy is always there for him, that we must not limit the future of arenas to so we dont have to rethink any future strategy. Not about punishing a good strategy, its about limiting the dominance of any 1 strategy over all of the others.

This is the point that someone doesn't understand...

This Post:
00
56772.143 in reply to 56772.142
Date: 2/24/2009 9:39:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i see two of them ;) Small arenas would help me, to stay at the top div^^

But will crush the potential system the BB made, because they are against farm teams - and i don't know how you want to pay 400k per week for a div one S5 with one strong center with a small arena?

Last edited by CrazyEye at 2/24/2009 9:41:37 AM

This Post:
00
56772.144 in reply to 56772.143
Date: 2/24/2009 9:44:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Who wants very small arenas,i don't know.Maybe the point is about some ENORMOUS arenas...

This Post:
00
56772.145 in reply to 56772.144
Date: 2/24/2009 9:49:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
so i say you they won't grw to infinite like you always say ;)

And the actuall income was to low for the rooster of the future, where you pay one of the 200k Center(i would say those 200k center are next season 300k per week), with a bunch of bad fist div player. So you need 200-300k for your star center, if you count with 30-45k slary for the other players, you will get a huge sum and with that salary they won't be good player when good skilled high potential players become more common, especially a 45k PF.

From: brian

This Post:
00
56772.146 in reply to 56772.145
Date: 2/24/2009 9:54:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
So, apparently the BB's have this ability to make changes and adjust formula's to re-balance the economy if they prefer BB to be more of a game about managing a basketball team instead of a game about building arenas.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
56772.147 in reply to 56772.145
Date: 2/24/2009 9:55:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
the ability of a manager could be to have the best team possible with relatively minimum incomes,certainly you cannot sustain two centers with the salary of a player like Motte or Mathiot.Look at the Nba,the teams have two or three superstars and the rest are good players,but not phenomenoes.Do you hane ever seen a roster of a team all made by all-star?

Advertisement