BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Shotblocking: Good or Bad?

Shotblocking: Good or Bad?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
205736.138 in reply to 205736.137
Date: 1/13/2012 6:20:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?

___________________IS_ ID _RB SB
Salary coefficients are .40 .40 .40 .20 for PF. And .46 .46 .46 .25 for center.

This Post:
00
205736.139 in reply to 205736.138
Date: 1/13/2012 6:23:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?

___________________IS_ ID _RB SB
Salary coefficients are .40 .40 .40 .20 for PF. And .46 .46 .46 .25 for center.

I'm not discussing salary coefficient,do you think SB worth half of IS,ID and REB actually(this is a serious question)?

This Post:
00
205736.140 in reply to 205736.139
Date: 1/13/2012 6:25:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
Don't know.

This Post:
00
205736.141 in reply to 205736.137
Date: 1/14/2012 12:20:52 AM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?


Any consistent evidence to say SB is crap?
Can you show some research to prove your point?

This Post:
00
205736.142 in reply to 205736.141
Date: 1/14/2012 12:30:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
Just to point something out here, potential coefficients look like this.
      IS      ID      RB      SB
PF    0.40    0.40    0.40    0.20
C     0.46    0.46    0.46    0.25


SB is lower by ~20. I know your saying that it's not worth it for what it effects, but for half of a salary hit I now think it's definitely worth it.

Any evidence to say this?


Any consistent evidence to say SB is crap?
Can you show some research to prove your point?


Nope, I like it. Other people think it's crap so I just had to prove a point.

This Post:
00
205736.145 in reply to 205736.142
Date: 1/14/2012 8:25:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
so it doesn't contribute much to potential....so maybe it doesn't do much in a game?

This Post:
00
205736.147 in reply to 205736.144
Date: 1/14/2012 9:30:38 AM
Zwölf
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
687687
Second Team:
Zwölf 2
Atleast when playing man to man SB should be almost as useful for guards as for centers, because everybody just follows their man if they drive or sth. In 2-3 zone SB is, I think, pretty useless for PG/SG like it says in the game manual.
rubbercube

This Post:
11
205736.148 in reply to 205736.143
Date: 1/14/2012 9:34:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
The fun thing about SB is that the ones that actually do like it has to prove that it works as while those who doesn't only have to say it or in this case write it for it to be so.

Yeah,and it makes prefectly sense
SB have a relevant impact on salary and potential while little to none apparent effects in a game...everyone can see the "negatives" aspects of have SB on their players,that's why SB lovers have to show to the other users the positives of SB,that are hidden or simply non-existent

Handling is another skill that seems to have little effects in game,but his impact on potential and salary seems to be lower than SB,so while I would never train it,doesn't hurt too much

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 1/14/2012 9:39:34 AM

Advertisement