BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - III.4 > Season 12 League III.4 Player Rankings

Season 12 League III.4 Player Rankings

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
138259.14 in reply to 138259.13
Date: 4/1/2010 9:44:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
that last part would be very interesting, if only it was easier to control how many minutes your players played.

By the way guys i have been and still am out of town, which is why i havent been active in the forum, bought any new players, or set my lineups appropriately. I just found a little bit of time to access the internet, and i'll be back in full action on sunday

This Post:
00
138259.15 in reply to 138259.11
Date: 6/4/2010 12:05:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Question for everybody in regards to how we want to handle the Spumante Pistons games.

I am going through on my day off and saving all of the game data from this season and I came up with an idea and needed the input of this league.

The Pistons did not go into sleep mode until we began Interleague play. My idea is to not include game data at all for any of the player rankings beyond the point where Interleague play begins for any game against the Pistons.

This will allow the Big 8 to make use of their early season games since they were active at that point. However, this will cause a slight imbalance in the rankings though it will be small enough to really have no impact.

The Big 8 will lose 7 games of stats for the second half of the season when Intraleague began while the Great 8 will lose all 8 of their games against the Pistons. Will this work for everyone? Will the Great 8 conference be okay with losing 1 more game than the Big 8 when it comes to the final rankings?

This has been my only idea so far. The Pistons have really fucked over the ranking system and caused me to take a step back and reanalyze my approach to this season.

This Post:
00
138259.16 in reply to 138259.15
Date: 6/4/2010 2:05:24 PM
Tachenko
IV.9
Overall Posts Rated:
5757
I totally agree with your rationale.

From: karapaks

This Post:
00
138259.17 in reply to 138259.16
Date: 6/4/2010 2:44:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I think your approach is perfectly fine.

This Post:
00
138259.18 in reply to 138259.15
Date: 6/4/2010 4:57:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
sounds good to me.

This Post:
00
138259.19 in reply to 138259.15
Date: 6/4/2010 5:58:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
sounds ok