BuzzerBeater Forums

How about this. Maybe could be done these demands for wage more elasticly. So once is that player in lower league for a while, he get used to a cheaper life. But once he gets first league, his demands will increase by the time.

So if he is transferlisted afterwards into lower league, will take some time before he gets into lower wage level.

This create two things. Players which will be transfer listed by high-league teams, will be kind of cheaper and these which goes out of bottom league, will have kind of bigger price, because of theirs salary.

That would possibly create enviroment, where would be biggest stars affordable for everyone. Especially for a first-league teams, because once are these wages setted by the way that lowleague team can hardly afford 1 player like that, whiile temporary this wage would be kindly acceptable by 1st league team, it could work.

Imagine something like this. There is a first league team which have maximum space for such a player 250k. There is a 3rd league team which have space like that 100k.
There will be a star which in 3rd league earns his maximum - that is 100k. If such player buy 1st league, his demands would increase into 250k for a 3-4 seasons before he would go into 250k and aditional 1-2 seasons before he would get his maximum 350k (for example).

i don't like it, and why you would buy player out of high leagues anymore when they get always salary increasing. As a top team you have to trade consistently to hold the wages down, for the suppose of a low league team maybe could trade with those players with raised salary.

Well I think that would cover faster decrease if he is traded into lower league. There is a possibility, that equilibrium for this could be found.

That idea counts pretty much with very tight budget of low-league teams. So you can have a lot of money, but once are your weekly-economical numbers in red collor, because of more these players, you are simply losing money.

So that means low-league team cannot be better than high-league team no matter what. Unless he wants to sacrifice something from the weekly budget. And that could be the point for the cup.

Last edited by aigidios at 9/7/2010 8:30:38 AM

That idea counts pretty much with very tight budget of low-league teams. So you can have a lot of money, but once are your weekly-economical numbers in red collor, because of more these players, you are simply losing money.

i am acting close to the border, since a while and i have one of the cheapest rsoster of my league ;) So the solution is to sell player all the time, to get the same quality to a cheap salary.

So that means low-league team cannot be better than high-league team no matter what. Unless he wants to sacrifice something from the weekly budget. And that could be the point for the cup.

depends of the size of this influence ;)

It's just ridicoulous that players with the same skills would have different salaries.Stop.

i am acting close to the border, since a while and i have one of the cheapest rsoster of my league ;) So the solution is to sell player all the time, to get the same quality to a cheap salary.

Of course, that is what you mean. Well this behaviour isnt something which could be the benefit for a kind game. Normally is that regulated by the will of a player. You have some contract which you have to comply. But I dont know about that in this game. Maybe if there would be possible to create an optional contract for a 3 seasons or like that if you want this bonus.

I dont know, seems really complicated now.

i am acting close to the border, since a while and i have one of the cheapest rsoster of my league ;) So the solution is to sell player all the time, to get the same quality to a cheap salary.

Of course, that is what you mean. Well this behaviour isnt something which could be the benefit for a kind game. Normally is that regulated by the will of a player. You have some contract which you have to comply. But I dont know about that in this game. Maybe if there would be possible to create an optional contract for a 3 seasons or like that if you want this bonus.

I dont know, seems really complicated now.

so the will of the player is to play, for BSG Hintertupfingen instead of the LA Lakers? because when he had offers from both clubs, he would go for a cheaper offer to the low league club8if you calculate about a normal 1-2 year contract).

That would be too realistic behaviour. In that case should not be possible to hold a great player for a long time in lower league or he would stagnate in his skills, because of lacking the competition or quit from singing another contract and so on.

Im trying to think about this implementation only in the salary way, im sure it would be really different if it would be as it should be. But Im not sure if anybody would like to play like that.

Say this to Matt Barnes(the real NBA player),I'm just curios to see his answer

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 9/7/2010 9:19:00 AM

Unreasonable that top players should play in lower divisions as these teams will play a lower salary. If anything the situation should change so that top players will play in top league.

i believe the decrease of the salary is the magic word, the BB said that they expect the elite players @ the actual salary

The actual salaries of the top-tier players are already too high in my opinion that is why I suggested the 300k salary cap for an individual. If the salaries are not capped they could still be subsidied through higher mercahndise revenues - as far as I have learned the additional money you get for a 400k+ player is in the 5-15k range, this is ridiculous.

As I mentioned before - Real Madrid made more than the 93 million € they paid for Ronaldo in his first year for the club only through the sale of his jersey... If you want estimations on basketball players google for LeBrons value...

In my opinion it is a shame to see the best players being shipped from team to team every week - this is like we would see Dwight Howard or Shaq in his prime play for another D-League team every other week...