BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training a SF?

Training a SF?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
195774.14 in reply to 195774.13
Date: 9/19/2011 2:14:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i think making him a c or PF is more promising, cause his guard skill ain't a good point to start.

Also i would consider to train more players, cause every lost training is lost money. And if your roster is young the playyer loose value, if they aren't trained and you sacrifice XP and cheaper skills at the current non trainings position. If you have a older roster, you put 2/3 of training mostly in players who didn't increase their value much through it.

This Post:
00
195774.15 in reply to 195774.14
Date: 9/19/2011 2:18:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
I have to agree, he needs a lot of 1v1 training, which isn't so bad, but starting at 4 OD he also needs a LOT of training to be able to cover the guard types that some folks use at SF. At 6'7" that OD training is gonna be a bit slow.

But PF is pretty promising I think, since with a couple PA and OD pops, and 1v1 forwards, he'd be rounded out pretty well. Then you could focus on the inside skills and train some other big men in the process.

From: WFUnDina

This Post:
22
195774.17 in reply to 195774.16
Date: 9/19/2011 11:23:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Really not hard at all. Don't waste money on training. It's like buying a 500dollar car off the side of the road to race at NASCAR.... You might as well walk and save yourself 500bucks. WHen you ahve the money to train, do it. Training is expensive and players are cheap...


What are you even talking about? We are talking about D.V. Oh that's right, you don't have the slightest clue about the struggles to get out of the USA D.V leagues. This doesn't equate to buy a 500$ car and competing with Nascar. Its buying a 500 dollar car and competing with other 500 dollar cars. Talk about missing the target.

Dr. Christopher, I agree with Tanqosz. He looks like a good candidate for PF.

Message deleted
From: WFUnDina

This Post:
00
195774.22 in reply to 195774.21
Date: 9/20/2011 12:18:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
"LOL" how many intelligent people use that?

I have a plan, I'm working on my plan. I didn't ask for help, did I?

I play 3 games a week, for 7 guys that will kill gameshape. But you knew that, right?

This Post:
00
195774.23 in reply to 195774.22
Date: 9/20/2011 2:15:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
perhaps I'll make him into a specialist down the line if I find a better trainee, but I really like unique players, and personally for me I'm not interested in winning or promoting past D.3. I just want to grow and train unique players that can really put a kink in an opponents gameplan. Thats why I'd rather take a player and do something crazy then stick to a easier PF route which no doubt would be smarter and more effecitive, but I can't afford a quality trainee right now so I'm just working to make Mr.Gero into the defensive powerhouse I've always admired. imagine a player with solid OD and ID and SB and can pass the ball around so he isn't a let down on offence. Like a dennis rodman/artest type player with average rebounding skills.

We have a lot of great outside shooters. Unfortunately, we play all our games indoors.
This Post:
22
195774.24 in reply to 195774.23
Date: 9/20/2011 2:24:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but especially when you go for training a SF a good basis/trainee is a very important because he needs every skill.

OD + ID is quite very powerful, also on PF but i doubt it that it is valuable to train this player to much into that direction because also here the starting skill is quite low and with the size the training is exhausting.

Overall i don't find the trainee bad for a beginner, but i don't think you should go for anything other then PF/C.

Advertisement