BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Potential importance.

Potential importance.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
213427.14 in reply to 213427.12
Date: 4/19/2012 10:18:15 AM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
544544
As others have said there is no age cap based on potential it all depends on whether the player has capped skill wise.

From: Muffins

This Post:
00
213427.15 in reply to 213427.13
Date: 4/19/2012 10:24:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
But you can't train that 25 starter player at that age he won't be able to get a single up although he hasn't reached his potential cap! Is this true or not?


I doubt its true, as far as I know,as long as your trainee is not capped, he can still improve, but at the age of 25 it'll be too slow that its not worth doing it,my 25 y/o star potential who has never got any training pop-ed in DV although it took 3 weeks 1on1 forwards with a lvl 4 trainer (speaking about trainer, I forgot to mention that trainer level also plays an important role in training speed in my previous post,my bad).

From: Golub
This Post:
00
213427.16 in reply to 213427.15
Date: 4/19/2012 10:34:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
427427
I was exaggerated with my last post that when I said that he won't get a single up.

But if there is no age-potential scale why the training will be to slow for star and not to slow for MVP?

*star hasn't reached his cap, he is far away of his cap

Last edited by Golub at 4/19/2012 10:36:06 AM

From: Golub

This Post:
11
213427.17 in reply to 213427.16
Date: 4/19/2012 10:37:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
427427
But if his skills haven't reached the potential cap, he'll train just as fast (or slow) as if his potential were MVP.


Do you have example?

From: Muffins

This Post:
00
213427.18 in reply to 213427.16
Date: 4/19/2012 10:49:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
As far as I know,it shouldn't slow down due to potential. Also the star might be slightly(1 or 2 weeks slower)than the MVP(same age) if he has a low sub-level in that particular skill while the mvp has a high sub-level in that skill

From: Golub

This Post:
00
213427.19 in reply to 213427.18
Date: 4/19/2012 11:02:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
427427
I am starting to figure this. If I understand everybody who try to explain me this, every player have potential cap and that is a limit of his opportunity to became a great player. And ages, height, trainer and other things just have influence of how quick he will reach his maximum.

So if this is true thanks for everybody :)))

Last edited by Golub at 4/19/2012 11:03:19 AM

From: lamchops

This Post:
00
213427.20 in reply to 213427.19
Date: 4/20/2012 1:31:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4343
Yup it sounds like you've understood.

This Post:
00
213427.21 in reply to 213427.20
Date: 4/20/2012 6:08:30 PM
Clovis Knights
III.9
Overall Posts Rated:
3636
Here is an interesting scenario:

What player would you rather train?

A 5k 21year-old with all-time great potential
or
A 5k 18year-old with star potential?

This Post:
11
213427.22 in reply to 213427.21
Date: 4/20/2012 6:52:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1313
I would take none of them ;)
But if I would have to answer the question:
Definitely the second one, the first will never reach his potential, so why bother even trying.
His training will be very slow too.

From: Jason

This Post:
00
213427.23 in reply to 213427.21
Date: 4/21/2012 1:01:07 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
11181118
Here is an interesting scenario:

What player would you rather train?

A 5k 21year-old with all-time great potential
or
A 5k 18year-old with star potential?


Star potental is a complete waste of time to train. A 21 year HOF who is 5K has obviously been wasted...and there might be better prospects out there, but there is still hope for that player. Plus, if you train that guy up a bunch, there are suckers who wet their pants when they see Hall of Fame, and will overpay you for him later.

Advertisement