BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > Fishbowl S13

Fishbowl S13

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
248668.14 in reply to 248668.12
Date: 9/22/2013 5:52:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
If you want to play the same tactic every single game why should you suffer a disadvantage?

There logic is probably "if a team plays the same tactic every week then an opponent will prepare for that tactic and therefore do slightly better against it". Which does logically make sense in the real world, but in BB world I think it just adds another random factor to the game and reduce the skill required to win the game.

This Post:
00
248668.15 in reply to 248668.14
Date: 9/22/2013 7:44:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
reduce the skill required to win the game.
I think it adds more skill to the game. You have to have a slightly more diverse team, so that you can throw in a different tactic every now and again, just to throw people off.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
248668.16 in reply to 248668.15
Date: 9/22/2013 8:56:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Sorry Trikster I agree with HAX here, having a team that is capable of playing multiple ways seems more interesting and fun that just building a LI team and playing the same tactic every week as I and most of the ABBL have for the past several seasons.

This Post:
00
248668.17 in reply to 248668.16
Date: 9/23/2013 4:12:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
Sorry Trikster I agree with HAX here, having a team that is capable of playing multiple ways seems more interesting and fun that just building a LI team and playing the same tactic every week as I and most of the ABBL have for the past several seasons.

Completely agree, however achieving that by "guessing for a bonus" is NOT the way to achieve it. Having a well balanced roster that is capable of playing different styles is how to achieve it .... that is why I don't like it

This Post:
00
248668.18 in reply to 248668.17
Date: 9/23/2013 4:42:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Well I agree that it would be much better if 3-2 zone destroyed outide offences, 2-3 zone destroyed inside offences and man to man was a safe guess. They are completly unwilling to fix the 2-3 zone, probably the coding is too difficult although if it was written properly there would be sliders/variables that you could just adjust. As they are unwilling to fix the zones so they all work this is the next best thing.

From: Axis123

This Post:
00
248668.19 in reply to 248668.18
Date: 9/23/2013 5:42:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
there would be sliders/variables that you could just adjust.
Now that would be awesome.....

This Post:
00
248668.20 in reply to 248668.18
Date: 9/23/2013 8:21:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
372372
Well I agree that it would be much better if 3-2 zone destroyed outide offences, 2-3 zone destroyed inside offences and man to man was a safe guess. They are completly unwilling to fix the 2-3 zone, probably the coding is too difficult although if it was written properly there would be sliders/variables that you could just adjust. As they are unwilling to fix the zones so they all work this is the next best thing.


That's a much more interesting idea!

I think it's the 'guess correctly for a bonus' is what's annoying people more than anything.

From: Axis123
This Post:
00
248668.21 in reply to 248668.1
Date: 9/27/2013 2:11:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Game one. I think I'm gonna get nailed.

From: ezyfrag

This Post:
00
248668.22 in reply to 248668.21
Date: 9/27/2013 4:01:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
me too

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
248668.23 in reply to 248668.22
Date: 9/27/2013 4:09:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Right now the Titans have me by three starting the fourth term. I need my big stars Lawrance, Sperbery and Barton to step up and earn their place.

This Post:
00
248668.24 in reply to 248668.21
Date: 9/27/2013 4:40:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
Well if the GE had actually subbed my guys occasionally you probably would have :)

Advertisement