BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > Canadian Player Advice

Canadian Player Advice

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
250168.14 in reply to 250168.13
Date: 10/20/2013 1:17:23 AM
Pszczyna Team
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Beanerz, you got yourself great player there. since he has incredible potential I would go as far as getting ID to 11-12, SB to 5 (at least 2 pops should be from secondary training, IS to 11 and RB to 9. then you can play him at SF with one-on-one training to get DR/HN where you want them to be and even more IS. Of couse mix OD somewhere in there. Then just go all the way with guard training to create ultimate SG :D

scorcher if I was you I would go heavy for U21, and by that I mean 2 pops in OD and then just 4 inside skills. After that one on one and passing. you will be happily surprised how fast he will pop even at 22.

HTG since he will probably never reach borderline NT level, I would just go for perfectly balanced 25k, 100TSP player that can fill a hole at every position

This Post:
00
250168.15 in reply to 250168.1
Date: 10/20/2013 2:41:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
What's your advice on my guy?

Weekly salary: $ 6 082
Role: rotation player
(BuzzerBeta)

DMI: 98200
Age: 19
Height: 6'11" / 211 cm
Potential: superstar
Game Shape: proficient

Jump Shot: mediocre Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: mediocre Handling: average
Driving: respectable Passing: pitiful
Inside Shot: prominent ↑ Inside Def.: proficient
Rebounding: strong Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: mediocre Free Throw: awful

Experience: atrocious

This Post:
00
250168.16 in reply to 250168.15
Date: 10/20/2013 10:39:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
Depending on your plan this season and how competitive you want to be, I would suggest a bit of OD and then some one on one for forwards. You don't need many outside pops before going hard after the big 4. Again don't neglect shot blocking :)

Nice looking player BTW

This Post:
00
250168.17 in reply to 250168.11
Date: 10/20/2013 11:00:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Here is my best Canadian trainee. Hoping to sneak him onto the NT by his age 26/27 season. Probably just going to train the big 4, maybe another passing pop or two.

Weekly salary: $ 20 444

Age: 23
Height: 6'10" / 208 cm
Potential: hall of famer

Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: strong
Outside Def.: prominent Handling: proficient
Driving: prominent Passing: strong
Inside Shot: prolific Inside Def.: tremendous
Rebounding: sensational Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: awful Free Throw: inept

Experience: mediocre

This Post:
00
250168.18 in reply to 250168.12
Date: 10/20/2013 1:47:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
That's basically what I'm making. However, I'd rather continue with the inside skills this season, then spend next season focusing on the outside skills. In the end, I'm looking for a great PF, although I have this guy already: (He's been injured couple times already, which is why hes a little behind in training, also drafted as 19yr old).

Weekly salary: $ 27 979
DMI: 99800
Age: 23
Height: 7'0" / 213 cm
Potential: perennial allstar
Game Shape: average

Jump Shot: prominent Jump Range: pitiful
Outside Def.: mediocre Handling: average
Driving: respectable Passing: mediocre
Inside Shot: sensational Inside Def.: sensational
Rebounding: prolific Shot Blocking: strong
Stamina: inept Free Throw: average

Experience: awful

This Post:
00
250168.19 in reply to 250168.17
Date: 10/20/2013 2:21:06 PM
Pszczyna Team
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
He is a great player and will end up as a starter in Naismith if trained properly. Not sure about NT, but just inside skills from now on and he might have a slight chance

This Post:
00
250168.20 in reply to 250168.13
Date: 10/20/2013 3:12:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
I think it'd be interesting to go the stretch-4 (or pivot) route. His potential limits him from becoming prototypically great.

92-100% capped and $64k salary:

14 JS, 9 JR
10 OD, 11 PAS, ~13 HND/DRV
10 IS, 14 ID, 14 REB, 9 SB

It's scary seeing such low IS with it being so great. But that's a moderate risk/extraordinarily high reward with the new GE.


This Post:
00
250168.21 in reply to 250168.20
Date: 10/20/2013 3:19:11 PM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
716716
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Because of the other 2 Hall of fame 'foreigners' I'm training, that looks strangely like how he might end up
One is ID weak and the other is RB weak

This Post:
00
250168.22 in reply to 250168.17
Date: 10/20/2013 3:32:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Oh man, you are in a tough conference and he'll get real expensive real quick if you only take up his insides. I think I'd consider training OD and PAS a bit more.

It might sound like overkill, but it's actually really beneficial for him and also the financials of your team. More OD (1-2 pops) and PAS (3-4 pops) wouldn't affect his salary a dime and would make him an incredibly more versatile player and potentially elite-elite NT player.

This Post:
00
250168.23 in reply to 250168.22
Date: 10/21/2013 12:33:25 AM
Pszczyna Team
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Weekly salary: $ 11 204
Role: backup
(BuzzerBeta)

DMI: 35000
Age: 21
Height: 6'3" / 190 cm
Potential: superstar
Game Shape: average
Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: strong
Outside Def.: prolific Handling: prominent
Driving: prolific Passing: proficient
Inside Shot: average Inside Def.: proficient
Rebounding: respectable Shot Blocking: mediocre
Stamina: inept Free Throw: mediocre ↑

Experience: awful


This is my only trainee at this point. How would you guys take use of 3-4 seasons of trianing that he has left in him?

This Post:
00
250168.24 in reply to 250168.23
Date: 10/21/2013 3:51:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Maybe an outside SF? An increase in all guard skills and some IS and ID. Since JS and REB are really expensive for SFs, keeping his REB at a modest level could be beneficial if potential caps work purely off salary. I don't know if that's the case, though.

side note: it feels dirty telling people to train outside-oriented players. if people listen, remember that I want all of the credit and none of the blame


Advertisement