BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New inside zone or fix 2-3.

New inside zone or fix 2-3.

Set priority
Show messages by
From: profit007

This Post:
22
181900.146 in reply to 181900.141
Date: 5/17/2011 7:12:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727


That's unreal, please fix 2-3, but don't confuse more managers saying they haven't good teams to perform 2-3(lack of ID-SB), when Canicas is by far good enough to perform a 2-3.

Thanks.



Confuse? When BB introduced new GE people were saying that LI is flawed, it's not working and then BB actually were teaching how LI works and people started to use different training patterns and LI worked. Now as I remember BB said specifically that SB is major factor in 2-3 zone but I am guessing BB is not talking about level 7-8 SB to beat level 20 IS they are probably talking about SB that can actually match the level of opponents IS and how often do you see C with level 20 SB? BB also stated that OD for C-PF position is needed for preventing passes. So I don't believe BB is confusing us but telling what skills are needed to make 2-3 zone work but people choose not to train SB because of its price and it's very time consuming to train OD for C-PFs. So I don't think is canicas is "good enough" for 2-3 zone according to notes that BB gave us about 2-3 zone.

Last edited by profit007 at 5/17/2011 7:19:56 PM

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
181900.147 in reply to 181900.144
Date: 5/17/2011 10:39:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
for things like this we say 2-3 is a bad decission, cause your players are matched similar than M2M but with poor results

in a zone, poor defenders always have less problems, thats the reason cause in nba it was not permitted


if you use weak defenders they won't necessary perform better in a Zone, a Zone helps to compensate atletical missmatches but makes other things tougher to defend. And defense is not just athletic. So generally it is good for different type of players.

This Post:
00
181900.154 in reply to 181900.148
Date: 5/18/2011 5:17:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Well, there are also some cases in which you play a 3-2 zone and you lose, when if you played m2m you would win. Why? Because the SF has to have good OD or the opponent players will just keep shooting on his face and making shots. Just because you have a good rating in OD doesn't mean that it will stop the opponents attack.

This Post:
00
181900.156 in reply to 181900.154
Date: 5/18/2011 7:54:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
IS doesn't affect SFs salary. (or SG or PG) So it's free to a few levels above any outside skill. While it's a chore to train IS for small players, those who have done rip the benefits. There are tons of guards with above Prominent outside skills and below Inept IS, I'm sure they won't be laying too much in vs 2-3 zone.

Advertisement