BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New inside zone or fix 2-3.

New inside zone or fix 2-3.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
181900.154 in reply to 181900.148
Date: 5/18/2011 5:17:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Well, there are also some cases in which you play a 3-2 zone and you lose, when if you played m2m you would win. Why? Because the SF has to have good OD or the opponent players will just keep shooting on his face and making shots. Just because you have a good rating in OD doesn't mean that it will stop the opponents attack.

This Post:
00
181900.156 in reply to 181900.154
Date: 5/18/2011 7:54:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
IS doesn't affect SFs salary. (or SG or PG) So it's free to a few levels above any outside skill. While it's a chore to train IS for small players, those who have done rip the benefits. There are tons of guards with above Prominent outside skills and below Inept IS, I'm sure they won't be laying too much in vs 2-3 zone.

This Post:
00
181900.157 in reply to 181900.153
Date: 5/21/2011 8:16:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
flow like politicians..
do we have to shout to make people understand 2-3 Zone is not working because it makes the opponent score with high percentage, not because it makes you lose the game..?

i must be crazy that i'm still writing in this forum..


you still dont get the advantage of a 23 zone..its not about the field goal percentage its all about the absolut number of shoots taken from opponents PF/C compared to a man/man def

Advertisement